Computerized All-Time Mixed Martial Arts Rankings
All-Time Absolute MMA Rankings
All-Time Womens (Open Weight) MMA Rankings
All-Time Heavyweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Light-Heavyweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Middleweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Welterweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Lightweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Featherweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Bantamweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Flyweight MMA Rankings
All-Time Strawweight MMA Rankings
The all-time rankings reflect the overall careers of MMA fighters. When observing these lists, it is important to consider the following:
- All-time rankings are division-specific, whereas the current rankings are division-adjusted. Therefore, a fighter CAN be ranked in more than one division.
- Longevity at or near the top of the division plays a huge role in where a fighter is ranked. Divisional strength is also a large factor in accumulating all-time ranking points.
- Head-to-head results have a minor, but direct effect.
- These rankings are not updated as often as the current rankings. Please check the last updated date at the top of the page.
- The nature of the rankings requires them for the most part, to be “slow” in reacting to results by active fighters. Think ‘rolling average’, versus immediate change when looking for effects from recent fights.
- Fluctuations in the position of active fighters may be a frequent occurrence. This is merely due to how these rankings are calculated. However, fluctuations may also accompany mathematical revisions or data updates.
- Early Pancrase (pre-late 2000) bouts and many non-UFC bouts (pre-1999) were open-weight. Due to the impact of these matches, the “credit” is assigned to fighters within the division that these fighters would’ve competed in had there been a more comprehensive divisional structure. Surrounding data (in terms of chronology) is analyzed to determine a division. If one cannot be definitively determined, the credit will be assigned to the fighter for Heavyweight+.
602 Comments
In fact, Hatsu Hioki should be closing in on the top 25 as well.
Highest absolute total for fighters not in any of the existing Top 25 lists.
Aldo finally caught Faber on the featherweight list…. well, it was always just a matter of time.
This new list is sort of interesting, but I’d much rather see the all-time absolute list expanded to 50 fighters.
Wow, Rampage has moved into first place on the light heavyweight list. I find that ranking at least plausible, but I suspect that if you polled on this issue you would get more votes for Chuck, Wand, and probably Jones than you would for Rampage. This seems to show the value of this method of ranking fighters — it brings out these sorts of things with subjective rankings usually miss. I think he has been underrated for most of his career anyway.
Some notes about the Absolute…
– Anderson and Fedor are still awfully close, in fact, a fluctuation could see Fedor jump atop momentarily… However, it’s not likely to happen.
– GSP has a ways to go to take #2.
– Gomi took a major dump in this latest update.
– Evans is #27, Hioki is #30, Edgar #32, Koscheck #44 — Edgar and Evans have more momentum than the other two IMO.
Wow… Dominick Cruz wasn’t even in the top ten on the bantamweight all-time list a few months ago and now he’s #3.
Not that I’m complaining.
I can tell you that Dan Henderson is #11 =)
Nevermind, the bug was pretty simple to resolve. It did affect Kunioku considerably, but not enough to move his rank down.
I’ll keep looking. I have a feeling these non-heavyweights are being over-rewarded for the old Pancrase bouts.
Thank You.
I just noticed that four of the five japanese fighters on the bantamweight list are either retired or should be. Meanwhile, the five americans on the list are still doing fairly well. As there are other american fighters also doing very well (mostly in the WEC), it seems that the americans are poised to dominate the bantamweight list over the next couple of years.
Why isn’t Igor on here? Yes at the end of his career he had losses but he went on a like a 32 unbeaten streak
Sorry if its been asked before but where is Sakuraba? Before loosing to Igor surely he was p4p number 1 or close to it? Filho and Gomi over him…. I really like the current rankings I think your doing a great job but the all time ones confuse me.
I see LaRosa got into the Division Dominance… I think I’ll restrict it to Men’s.
I know it must seem as if I do nothing but complain, but it’s only because I’m very fond of this site and would like to see it reach it’s full potential. Anyways, keep up the good work.
I am being told that a Phil Cardella is ranked #8 in the world. When I see him on your sight it is 458. So which is true? Was at one point in time ranked #8? Thank you in advance for your help? Best regards,
Mike Almstead
Yeah, I’ve got no problem with Henderson in the top ten. Marquardt way up there at #12 is the one that I’ll never agree with.
Also, the top five guys are all known for their success in just one division. I don’t think “multi-divisional accomplishments” are given extra credit at all.
will rousey crack the top 25 now? 2/24/2013
Nate is currently #13. If Bas and Frank can get all that credit for Pancrase, why can’t Nate?
Essentially, Nate has been Top 10 in his division since the end of 2000. There may have been some times where he has been between 11-15, but looking back, his average rank in this time period would probably be #6. He’s also had no spells of inactivity, and less than a handful of opponents outside of the Top 50. Middleweight has been a strong division for a while now…
How many fighters can say the same thing?
I think you’ll find that Marquardt will drop soon, as more fighters will be able to say the same thing.. like a Fitch.. but Marquardt is still hanging tough and earning points.
Those guys look weak historically, but were obviously much better back then, ability-wise and relative to the competition — Particularly Kiuma Kunioku.
There are several guys who get too much credit on this site for their Pancrase accomplishments- Marquardt is the most blatant example.
He wasn’t even that impressive in Pancrase(losses against Genki Sudo, Kiuma Kunioku, Izuru Takeuchi, Keiichiro Yamamiya, and Ricardo Almeida. Wins against Daiju Takase, Kiuma Kunioku, Shonie Carter, Hikaru Sato, Masaya Kojima, Yuji Hoshino, Kazuo Misaki, Seiki Ryo, Kiuma Kunioku, Izuru Takeuchi, Yuji Hisamatsu, Izuru Takeuchi. Draws against Kiuma Kunioku and Eiji Ishikawa. That’s a 12-5-2 record against very lackluster opposition. He does have a few big wins in the UFC.
Silva/GSP/Fedor/Hughes are going to have some staying power. They are the tier 1 legends of the sport.
I think the rest of those guys you see in the top 25 except for Aldo, Jon Jones and maybe Rashad and Melendez are going to get swallowed up. Only reason I list them as maybes is because I think they still have time left to do things…
Bug fixed. Rampage up to #14, Ortiz down to #17. Rest of list is unchanged.
There’s actually a bug I just found in the absolute calculation… Have to fix that.
Thanks for the quick reply.
And I hadn’t even noticed that Gomi had dropped several spots (but i do agree with it).
I’m really surprised that Fitch isn’t in the top 25 on the absolute list.
Much appreciated, thank you.
Nate Marquardt at #13 is the one that shocks me the most.
I thought you would enjoy it.
I’m sure it will allow more issues to reveal themselves, but I figured we were ready for some expansion.
The American dominance at Welterweight is pretty amazing… I just noticed that.
Furthermore, eventually, I plan on incorporating a direct impact on the rankings based on head-to-head match ups with other ranked fighters. I feel this is an important cog that is sometimes overlooked by the equation, especially for prolific fighters of the early MMA scene. It will also help determine who is overrated and who is underrated IMO.
The first iteration shows Semmy Schilt is one of the most overrated fighters on the rankings (go figure)…
11 Henderson
12 Faber
13 Marquardt
14 Barnett
15 Ortiz
16 Rampage
17 Filho
18 Shogun
19 Sherk
20 Machida
21 CroCop
22 Aoki
23 Franklin
24 Ribeiro
25 Sakurai
Who is Rhonda? I’d expect RONDA to make her appearance on the list very soon. She has a whopping SIX fights.
It seems like the abolute rankings may over-reward multi-divisional accomplishments. Seems very strange to me that Chuck Liddell could be behind Dan Henderson.
Hendo’s accomplishment was for the career rankings, not the current rankings.. What are you asking for in regards to Horn?
There are some things affecting Sakuraba that are not normally seen:
1 He bounced between divisions very frequently.
2 Some of his biggest name wins came against those fighters before they hit their primes.
3 MMA was weak when he was at his best.
4 He should have retired years ago.
—-
#1 is being accounted for. #2 causes many to overrated him and you could argue that in this type of system, he is not getting proper credit. #3 affects his rating negatively, as does #4. These are CAREER-long rankings and I do not have any logic in place to not penalize a fighter if he hangs around (in this case -WAY-) past his prime. The penalty he receives as a result of #4 is small, but is there.
In any case, he’s just outside the Top 25 at Light Heavy.
Fighters are rated in the divisions they fought, not in the division they weighed in at. He is nowhere near the greatest fighter in history. After his three years of “dominance”, you saw how successful he was when fighters started learning how to handle wrestling.
I know I’ve said this before, but the way these rankings calculate is more like a rolling average, whereas the current rankings show more immediate, harsh changes.
In other words, I wouldn’t expect massive changes tomorrow.
“accomplishments in all divisions”
Will (did) we see some movement upward for Henderson for his victory over Fedor?
It looks like some sort of changes in the system? I just noticed that Liddell passed Jackson at light heavyweight and Sherk passed Franklin yet again. Roussey just moved up two more spots as well.
Cardella has never been anywhere close to #8. He’s not even ranked currently.
Where did you see that info?
Thanks for the prompt reply. As always, it’s greatly appreciated.
Sanchez 39, Cruz 57… of course, Sanchez is probably peaked out.
New all-time rankings will be released this week — probably tomorrow.
I thought losses at the end of a career wasn’t supposed to cause a former great to spiral downwards in the rankings?
I’ll be looking forward to the new rankings.
I know what you are saying but the rankings don’t take into account the fact that the middleweight division has always been a B class division with B level fighters. If CroCop was a middleweight he would have never lost. You can’t just assume that each division has the exact same quality of fighters. Even now the middlweight division is devoid of superstar talent apart form Anderson of course.
Does anyone know why Barnett, Franklin, Marquart and Fitch are on the absolute list when CroCop isn’t? He is the only superstar missing from it. He was a far superior fighter to the 4 I just mentioned.
Now I’m wondering just how far down the list Cro Cop has slid… He must be 34th or worse- Dos Santos is 33rd and higher than Cro Cop in the all-time heavyweight rankings (and both of them have spent their entire mma careers at heavyweight, with no input from other divisions).
#25 sounds like a decent spot then.
Ribeiro rode near the top of the division for quite a while.. and to do so, he had to get some good wins. I will however, look at the code.. as I had planned an optimization anyhow..
I see that Anderson has dropped backed to #2 in the all-time absolute rankings. I’m assuming that this is very temporary?
JCS I was wondering if I could bother you to dig out a stat for me. Im doing a Hall of Fame on the armbar and Im thinking about Jeremy Horn.
You recently posted that Hendo was the 1st man to crack the top 50 in 3 devisions, I was wondering what Horn ranked at Hw at the highest, I know he drew with Severn and after he beat Liddell I could be wrong but he got another Hw win in UFC.
Was curious to know how high he got at Hw if it isnt a hastle to dig out the stats. Cheers mate.
I’m guessing that Velasquez and Dos Santos will both be in the top four of the all-time heavyweight list within a couple of years. I’m also thinking that they will both reach the top 25 on the absolute list sometime in 2013.
The same reason that BJ Penn is ahead of Urijah Faber.
Are these rankings automatically re-calculated once a fighter in the list was updated in the current MMA rankings?
Like JDS who has gone to #1 in the HW div, do you have to manually trigger the update in the all-time HW div or is it done automatically?
Once a month, usually on the 2nd or 3rd.
Horn is #56 at HW All-Time. As you may know, for “current rankings”, we only have quarterly snapshots prior to a few years ago. Therefore, the resolution isn’t THAT precise in order to give you a valid ‘highest’ ever rank at HW. I do see he held positions around #20 a few times..
Ummm, Gomi over BJ? Whaaat? Makes no sense at all. BJ faced tougher competition, fought out of his weight class, held a UFC belt, dominated the lightweight division, is a two division UFC champ, and utterly DOMINATED Gomi. What did Gomi really do? Crush a bunch of cans and then get smoked by any haf decent fighter he fights in the UFC, that’s what.
Will Benavidez make Peak Division Dominance Top 25?
ps I appreciate your feedback 🙂
Did Horn ever get ranked as a Hw? What was the highest ranking he posted on current rankings as a Hw if he did?
Where would he feature on the career list as a heavyweight as well?
Thanks again.
Interesting… what is the criteria for such a blended list?
where is #22 on the division dominance list?
This DD list is a little different.. you have to have some good tenure in the division to make the all-time list.
I don’t understand why Jones isn’t ranked on Absolute.
3rd highest at his peak, with over 16 fights and he isn’t passed guys like Edgar who have had less fights, or guys like Machida who have had barely more fights but a LOT less notable wins than Jones?
BJ fighting outside of the division means nothing for his Lightweight ranking — it actually takes away from it because it means he spent time in other divisions that he could’ve spent at Lightweight. Notice BJ is ranked at Welterweight and also has points at Middleweight. Also notice BJ is higher in the Absolute ranking.
Gomi spent his entire career at Lightweight.
It’s actually pretty close between 1 and 2, but Gomi has it based on much, much more worthwhile longevity in the division. It’s like Sandy Koufax (BJ) vs. Nolan Ryan (Gomi).
Now, even if Penn never goes back to 155.. he COULD eventually catch Gomi. It’s unlikely, but possible — we do backfill data as it comes along and if Gomi tanks hard, even though we mostly discount past-prime mega losing.. it’s not totally discounted.
Yes, Gary. Being top-ranked with stronger competition results in an increased standing… so it is slanted toward modern fighters in that aspect.
That’s mostly true, but I cannot completely exclude it from consideration. It’s also kind of tough to gauge the primes of fighters that are still fighting… If it continues to be a problem I’ll take a look at it, though prime or no prime, I think this latest stint may have proven that Gomi would have had issues hanging in the UFC back in his prime. and personally, at this point I think 13th is better than 8th for him IMO.
JCS, could you tell us where Dos Santos and Jones are ranked on the all-time absolute list?
Absolutely, I’ve always thought that Gomi was somewhat overrated. In fact, I still believe that many fighters who fought mostly in Japan during their primes tend to be overrated. I know that you’ve made some adjustments to deal with this problem, but in my opinion, not enough.
Sorry if answered already, but is this all-time list skewed, (intentionally or unintentionally), to favour guys who are more modern because there are more fighters to be measured against as time goes on?
Guys that seem lower, but were most certainly quite dominant in their time would include Vovchanchin, Menne, Frank Shamrock, Dan Severn, etc.
Would someone like Mousasi score higher because he’s in a bigger pond now, compared to when Frank Shamrock completely dominated his era?
It’s hard to imagine Mousasi being mentioned before Frank Shamrock in a conversation about all-time great LHWS, or Lesnar before Vovchanchin in the HWs, etc.
Thanks for the info. That’s about what I expected, they could reach the top 25 by the end of the year.
We don’t really want to do that, because most viewers will think anything that happened since the last update was due to current fights, when in actuality, fluctuations on this list can and have been pretty wild and seemingly random.
I know the routine- I fully expect a few small changes at most.
You saw an incomplete update. Sorry for the confusion.
Probably have it out later today.
I really do cringe at the thought of DeLucia, Mezger and Kondo being on the all-time heavyweight list. I’m not sure Schlitt, Rutten and Funaki belong there, either. I realize that it’s not going to happen, but I actually wish that you’d ignore Pancrase’s open-hand era altogether. At the very least you could weight it so these guys didn’t get so much credit for beating a bunch of mediorcre, blown-up welterweight and middleweights with silly rules.
there’s a major issue with letting a computer pic the top fighters based on stats.
it’s being fed stats about fighters who fight within certain weightclasses. usually their own weight or a weight they cut down to.
problem is Kazushi Sakuraba is nowhere on the lists. He was 183lbs. BJ Penn’s walk around weight. the difference is he fought the best fighters in the world reguardless of weight, beating most of them. Not to mention he didn’t fight outpoint folks he always fought to finish. He is arguably the greatest fighter in history with 3 years of dominance under his belt and ending the Gracie unbeatable myth. Also beating 7 men who were UFC WW-HW champs aswell as 3 kings of Pancrase and a Dream GP champ.
I don’t make guesses on these lists anymore =), but Faber has a lot of room between himself and Aldo.
How close is Benavidez to the top 25 flyweight list?
They disappeared for a day… back now.
Also, Cro Cop’s MMA prime only lasted four or five years (and at best, he was the number #3 guy in his division during that time).
LOL… What does Crop Cop’s success in K-1 kickboxing have to do with his ranking on the all-time absolute MMA list? And like I already said, Cro Cop was a top quality MMA fighter for 4-5 years and was never higher than the number 3 guy in his division even then.
Meanwhile, Franklin was briefly #1 in his division and near the top for several years. Barnett has been a top 10 heavyweight for about 13 years (although it’s been several years since he’s beaten a top 10 heavyweight). Fitch was the #2 or #3 welterweight for about 6 years. I do think Marquardt is overrated, but even he was a top 10 middleweight for most of the last 10 or 12 years.
Basically, Cro Cop’s time near the top wasn’t long enough to justify him being on this list. Similar to Tito Ortiz, time has past him by and he fell off the list. Rich Franklin will soon follow him. And Fitch soon afterwards.
I don’t have any problems with Cro Cop being left left off, but I’ll never agree with Marquardt being way up there at #14.
Igor is #15 Heavyweight currently. Sakuraba spent too much time shifting around weight classes to be in any Top 25. Frank is #9 at Light Heavy as you’ll notice above. Severn and Royce are bottom of Top 20, we rate on accomplishment, not pioneer status or name value. Rickson is somewhere around #50 Heavyweight/Open
It’s questionable that someone like Alexandre Franca Nogueira could be on a list at number 2 having dropped his last two fights. Can anyone tell us what factors are considered when putting these lists together. It seems to me that using only empirical data to populate the lists makes for questionable rankings
Also , how the hell is Almeida on the MW list when Evan Tanner isn’t? , Ridiculous
Sometimes the rankings don’t make sense if a guy is just getting into his prime. By nature, its part longevity-based, part accomplishment-based. In other words, Edgar could be late to the party since he just hit the big time.
I’m doing an update this week. Not sure he gets on, but if he stays near the top it shouldn’t be too long until he does.
I think I know something that will assist the issue, but will need time to test. Basically, my adjustment for the early Pancrase stuff is too strong and does not consider a few early aspects of MMA and the challenges that Pancrase brought upon it.
These lists are a great idea, but I do wish that you’d consider expanding them to the 25 or even 50 fighters.
Why is Lindland ahead of Henderson , and how the hell is Schilt number 8 at HW?
Franca’s 3 of his last 5 were at Lightweight. He was a top Featherweight for years, winning/defending the Shooto 143 belt many times. At this point, he’s past his prime.
These rankings are more concerned about what the fighter did, then about what they didn’t do. His last two losses are also on the Top 10 Featherweight All-Time list.
These rankings are a mixture time-based and raw accomplishment-based due to them being a career ranking.
You don’t want to award a “flash in the pan” too heavily, nor do you want to award a longtime fringe contender a top 10 spot.
Edgar’s career is pretty young and as such, he’s behind guys like Florian and Melendez, but obviously he’s ascending at a faster rate than those guys.
Pulver on the other hand has some important wins early in the “pioneer” 155 days. He also held alofty ranking for extended periods. A lot of the wins don’t look good on name value, but even wins like Dennis Hallman and Phil Johns (at the time) were very good wins.
I’m too
What do you mean by “run off”?
Maybe one day.
How is DC rated so low when he has only lost once
Thanks for pointing it out, got rid of all the references to the DD-Peak list.
You have a Heavyweight bias.
Rutten had a 4ish year stay at the top in one division when MMA was in its infancy. Faber was an elite fighter in two divisions for roughly a decade at a point when the sport is much much stronger.
How many all-time Heavyweight greats did Rutten beat? In reality, Rutten was a Light Heavy hanging in Pancrase, beating up on undersized fighters. I’m not downplaying the guy’s career, because as you said, he’s in our Top 10 HW All-Time list.. but come on.
If you thought the Absolute list was a Royal Rumble of sorts.. you are wrong.
How is Mighty Mouse only 20 in the absolute division? He’s tied the record for title defenses. While flyweight isn’t the strongest division 10 defenses that include 2 wins over the likes of Benavidez and Dodson, as well as wins over Horiguchi and Cejudo should count for something. Especially considering these have all been incredibly dominate performances. I would think that should at least land him a spot in the top ten.
“Hover over the division dominance list to view the weight class info and peak dominance date.”
This part is gone n
Skill level here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-S-j1aq0QA
So McGregor is #1 FW of all time because he beat Aldo, and left the division? Should Weidman be #1 MW because he beat Silva? I don’t think you understand how the “all time” rankings work.
“The all-time division dominance has minimum requirements for divisional tenure and as of 11/2012 uses the same revamped model as in the current rankings.” is still there
Is it possible to see more than just the top 25 absolute all time rankings?
Anderson is the best because he has defeated way more difficult talent and he moved up in divisions to take on even heavier competittors. Gsp got beat up for 30 seconds and stopes the fight. Anderson got beat up for 3 or 4 rounds and still won so better endurance. Plus when was the last time gsp knocked someone out in highlight fashion. Anderson does it like every time he fights
DJ is now #42
No
Great idea! it would be cool if you gave a more detailed explanation as to how these rankings are calculated. You should also consider making a peak dominance ranking if that is possible
Jones 35, JDS 37
He didn’t necessarily peak .. his division lead peaked.
Igor is #13 at last check.
Hey now.. its a prestigious thing to get into the Top 10 :).
Seriously, when you leave the Top 10, in most divisions, guys are very close together. Add fluctuations in, and you’ve got people moving up and down constantly. Really, these rankings will only solidify after guys retire and if we ever finalize data.
In other words, I’d like to keep it at 10 for now.
Lindland/Henderson are neck and neck. We discovered we had some early Hendo matches at the wrong division. He will move ahead of Lindland on next update, probably permanently.
Schilt is #8 at HW because he was at (or near) the top during his early days in Pancrase. The heavyweight/openweight quality there was a lot higher than what the average American fan thinks/realizes.
Evan Tanner had a grand total (that we know of) of 9 Middleweight fights. He was 5-4.
where are royce and rickson gracie, sakuraba, franck shamrock, dan severn and igor??????
The problem here is Hendricks was gassed out byt the GSP fight. Second he LOST ! get over it yankee !. as Dan White ahs said many times , “do not leave it in the hands of the judges”. if this was non title fight then who knows. But the score cards said it all. Was it a close fight, YES.And on another note one does not have to have the best face face after a gith nor during. The Hendrik’ s punch’s landed but few of them. take a ook a this fight again bro. And Dan White? he is so much dis-respect full of the fighters who fight in the UFC. Not give GSP the belt by putting it round his waist after was a real slap in the face. More damage then anything Hendriks could have thrown. try being a class act like GSP and you get dammed for it. Act like a total goon like Henricks and you praise. that`s how most americans think. Oh yah forgot you won all thw world wars and more.
You can’t.
Where can I view all-time rankings for past times? Thanks!
That top 3 is pretty lofty like it is at LHW, but Rousey should get to #4 fairly quickly.
The real “run” is up now. Yesterday’s was an intermediate of sorts..
Personally, I think these rankings are very accurate. Yeah, Marquardt gets way too much credit and Weidman is an interesting case… but otherwise, there’s nothing to complain about.
Marquardt’s career seems to be finally winding down…he should start slidind down the all-time list over the next several months.
K-1 hasn’t been relavent in at least ten years.
It already works this way Mark.
FYI – Strawweight is at a limit of 120lb… or at least, that’s what we’re starting it at.
Having the “peak DD” in All-Time is tough… because as long as the new #1 beats the old #1 while the old #1 is still in his prime… the new #1 will be higher ranked in all-time DD because the divisions keep getting stronger and the distance between #1 and the division norm will keep getting wider.
what did rousey weigh for her 1st pro fight against gomes?
It was a rather weak field by K-1 GP standards, compared to Mirko’s glory days. Wonder if he will retire now on a high note, having finally won a title.
It’s nice to see Aldo moving up the featherweight list. It looks like he’ll catch Faber sometime next year (assuming he doesn’t move up in weight before then). He should reach top 25 on the absolute list next year as well.
Just a thought but Maby the absolute rankings need slightly different Criteria, Gomi’s career has also gone down the sh1tter as well and he achieved a lot less than Saku ever did in terms of who he beat. He hasn’t many Great career wins and even if you overlook the Diaz loss has a poor head to head record with ranked fighters. Saku on the other hand has been in with much better opponents and has a better head to head record with greats.
Saku in my head should at least be top 10, the Current rankings if say number 3 Mw moves to Lhw he might be ranked at 5th… this shows that fighting bigger guys is harder and should maby be shown somehow in the absolute rankings. I think maby its something to consider in an eara where weight classes werent as defined?
How is Gilbert Melendez above Shogun when he hasn’t fought in the UFC? He hasn’t fought any of the top lightweights of the UFC yet he’s above Shogun who’s fought a who’s-who of the lightheavy weight division. How are Faber and Marquart above Shogun as well? Cheers, Mark.
Jcs, Could you tell us where Dominick Cruz and Diego Sanchez are ranked on the all-time absolute list?
Where is Dan Severn on the Hw list?!!! 100 wins and the dude still can get his place in the top 25!
Do you know where he ranks in terms of the Hw all timers?
Cheers.
Did not expect Fedor to get overtaken…
Gomi was a top-ranked 155er for almost a decade.
It’s nice to see that Aldo finally made the Absolute list. I’d expect him to to move up very rapidly over the next year or so. I also expect him to replace Faber as #1 on the all-time featherweight list sometime next year.
Love this site, the rankings are so accurate… almost! Where is cro-cop in the pound-for-pound list? I feel he was a far superior fighter to marquart, franklin, barnett, etc… I don’t know if these rankings take into account that the middleweight division has always been far weaker than the light-heavyweight division. But other than that it’s a quality site!
Barnett is on the list and Cro Cop destroyed him 3 times. Cro Cop was the most feared striker in the world, hanged with Fedor, dominated Big Nog before getting submitted, ended Wanderlei’s reign at the top, and carried out so many highlight reel knockouts – plus he crossed over from a different combat sport in which he was also successful in K1. Marquart, Frnaklin and Fitch haven’t doen anything near as impressive.
All-time rankings down for a few hours..
Hmm Hector Lombard surpassed Tanner on this latest update.
At first glance, it may seem strange, but Tanner had a grand total of 5 wins at Middleweight. Yes, one was a UFC championship fight for a vacant belt.. against David Terrell, a 5-1 fighter.
Lombard has dozens of wins at Middleweight. Tanner may have achieved a higher peak, but it was extremely short.
Some very interesting changes. Some are definitely for the better (Schilt, Kunioku). I’m not so sure about some of the other changes (Sonnen, Sherk, Pulver). As for Sakurai, I’m surprised but I don’t really disagree.
It’s about time I saw some realistic rankings p4p wise. Good work guys, finally another MMA site that keeps it real.
A couple of notes: I was a bit surprised to see that Tito Ortiz had fallen completely out of the top 25. On the other hand, it was nice to see Fitch, Torres and Shields moving up the list.
I would really really like to see a top 20 for the all-time rankings. The number of fighters involved is so much greater than with the “Current” rankings. A top 10 doesn’t seem to tell the full story.
I just realized that Anderson Silva has finally passed Fedor Emelianenko on the all-time absolute list. I’m guessing that GSP will take the #2 spot before the end of the year.
Fighters can move down as a result of losses, data changes, certain metrics, etc. However, its going to mostly be an upward trend. We just released a metric update, which saw some changes. The algorithm also has a data segmentation component, as well as falling back on the database itself for some parameters…. not to mention code changes.
JCS, is there any chance that you could update the the all-time top 25 again? It’s always greatly appreciated.
Edgar/Florian are a little ahead of Maynard, although obviously Florian is stalling a bit. I don’t think Maynard makes it in by the end of this year. Who knows? We have your prediction on record.
The Top 3 at LHW is just a never-ending fluctuation. Hopefully Rampage will take the lead and run with it.
Any chance you could show the number of spots a fighter moved up or down since the last update?
1 – Losses have to count. There’s no way around this, other than a 100% re-design of the all-time rankings (not gonna happen).
2 – The overall strength has to count for something. Otherwise, you’d have guys like Erik Paulson near the top of the Middleweight list.
3 – I realize this adversely affects the prestige of a few fighters, but I don’t have enough old data to even begin to fairly compensate.
4 – Thanks!
I’ve got a fair routine in place to exclude some of the extreme past prime cases from a few of the metrics. Minor change, probably for the better, but will result in even stranger fluctuations..
I updated the rankings with this change, though the top date didn’t change… Ah well. This minor change had very little effect on the fighters that I thought it would affect.
Nice to see GSP in the #2 spot- it’s long overdue.
Tanner was 5-4 at Middleweight and had no major accomplishments at Light Heavyweight.
Fedor being #1 in his division for 7 years
how is not that the best division dominance?
Nate Marquardt greatest A. Silva , Ch. Sonnen , Y. Okami and all fighters in middleweight division .
Kiuma Kunioku burst onto the scene as the #4 Welterweight of All-Time after reclassification of some older Pancrase bouts. As (conceivably) a Welterweight, Kunioku beat much larger, notable fighters such as Guy Mezger, Frank Shamrock, Yuki Kondo, and Masakatsu Funaki.
Many of his early Pancrase bouts (as well as Marquardt’s) that were held within set divisional limits straddled the line between our Middleweight and Welterweight ranges. Just recently, I found more info that suggested they were technically Welterweight bouts (even though they were for the Middleweight KoP titles).
This seems to have placed the Pancrase credit for Kunioku to Welterweight, and I believe before he received the credit for Heavyweight (because a “real” division could not be ascertained).
To be perfectly honest, there’s no good way to handle the old Pancrase bouts for the non-Heavyweights.
If you ask me, Welterweight is a crap shoot below #3 anyway.
Just how the f did Anderson peak a month ago?
He peaked around the beginning of 09′.
I believe I did find a bug though that would improperly reward non-heavyweights in the old Pancrase days… Ahh. it will be a beast to fix though. Stay tuned.
Remember that Sonnen spent 2/3rds of his career at 205. He’ll likely need another two good years to have a chance at cracking the top 10.
There is an issue with Cain Velasquez ranking. He needs his win over Travis Browne factored in. I clicked on him and it has him at 13-2 with his last fight being Werdum. I don’t know if it will affect his ranking but it’s an issue
There is an issue with Cain Velasquez ranking. He needs his win over Travis Browne factored in. I clicked on him and it has him at 13-2 with his last fight being Werdum. I don’t know if it will affect his ranking but it’s an issue
Maybe one day.
How about having separate lists for each women’s division?
How about having separate lists for each women’s division?
How is DC rated so low when he has only lost once
How is Mighty Mouse only 20 in the absolute division? He’s tied the record for title defenses. While flyweight isn’t the strongest division 10 defenses that include 2 wins over the likes of Benavidez and Dodson, as well as wins over Horiguchi and Cejudo should count for something. Especially considering these have all been incredibly dominate performances. I would think that should at least land him a spot in the top ten.
You have a Heavyweight bias.
Rutten had a 4ish year stay at the top in one division when MMA was in its infancy. Faber was an elite fighter in two divisions for roughly a decade at a point when the sport is much much stronger.
How many all-time Heavyweight greats did Rutten beat? In reality, Rutten was a Light Heavy hanging in Pancrase, beating up on undersized fighters. I’m not downplaying the guy’s career, because as you said, he’s in our Top 10 HW All-Time list.. but come on.
If you thought the Absolute list was a Royal Rumble of sorts.. you are wrong.
I’d really like to know how you can put Bas Rutten in the top 10 heavyweights of all time but put guys like weidman, machida, cain, werdum, Jackson and freaking Faber…..FABER ahead of him in the absolute list.
I’d really like to know how you can put Bas Rutten in the top 10 heavyweights of all time but put guys like weidman, machida, cain, werdum, Jackson and freaking Faber…..FABER ahead of him in the absolute list.
Thanks for pointing it out, got rid of all the references to the DD-Peak list.
“The all-time division dominance has minimum requirements for divisional tenure and as of 11/2012 uses the same revamped model as in the current rankings.” is still there
The All-Time Peak Division Dominance list is gone entirely. There were some issues with the algorithm generating that list, and the results it produced often defied common sense. We’ve been tossing around some ideas for another all-time list to replace the DD-Peak, but haven’t settled on anything yet…
“Hover over the division dominance list to view the weight class info and peak dominance date.”
This part is gone n
The All-Time Peak Division Dominance list is gone entirely. There were some issues with the algorithm generating that list, and the results it produced often defied common sense. We’ve been tossing around some ideas for another all-time list to replace the DD-Peak, but haven’t settled on anything yet…
Ha, ha, ha, – Women (Open)
This is fuc..ng joke!!!
… ,,the best” experts do this !
Ha, ha, ha, – Women (Open)
This is fuc..ng joke!!!
… ,,the best” experts do this !
So McGregor is #1 FW of all time because he beat Aldo, and left the division? Should Weidman be #1 MW because he beat Silva? I don’t think you understand how the “all time” rankings work.
Aldo better than mcgregor? Didn’t mcgregor knock him out with one hit for the fastest championship knockout to ever happen? As far as featherweight is concerned, mcgregor is number 1 and has dominated that division with ease.
Aldo better than mcgregor? Didn’t mcgregor knock him out with one hit for the fastest championship knockout to ever happen? As far as featherweight is concerned, mcgregor is number 1 and has dominated that division with ease.
Anderson is the best because he has defeated way more difficult talent and he moved up in divisions to take on even heavier competittors. Gsp got beat up for 30 seconds and stopes the fight. Anderson got beat up for 3 or 4 rounds and still won so better endurance. Plus when was the last time gsp knocked someone out in highlight fashion. Anderson does it like every time he fights
I agree with ccrider, except that GSP lost only twice, and avenged both losses in impressive fashion (twice, in the case of Matt Hughes, one of the all-time greats). I respect those who disagree or have different preferences, but GSP evolved from his earlier “Rush” persona to become a supremely intelligent and tactical fighter, able to beat fighters of any style, frequently at their own games, out-boxing strikers and out-wrestling decorated wrestlers. He also dominated a division absolutely loaded with talent; in my view, neither Fedor nor the Spider fought as many top opponents, so GSP should get some credit for that.
I agree with ccrider, except that GSP lost only twice, and avenged both losses in impressive fashion (twice, in the case of Matt Hughes, one of the all-time greats). I respect those who disagree or have different preferences, but GSP evolved from his earlier “Rush” persona to become a supremely intelligent and tactical fighter, able to beat fighters of any style, frequently at their own games, out-boxing strikers and out-wrestling decorated wrestlers. He also dominated a division absolutely loaded with talent; in my view, neither Fedor nor the Spider fought as many top opponents, so GSP should get some credit for that.
Skill level here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-S-j1aq0QA
Only three losses. One on a lucky haymaker. All but one decision was unanimous…..which means he dominated throughout. He had the stamina to go five rounds as he put on clinics. Not many fighters can go 5 rounds routinely and dominate. He dominated prolific college wrestlers at their own game, submitted Matt Hughes and BJ Penn. Fought Koshcek, Hughes, Serra, Fitch, Penn, Alves, Hardy, Shields, Condit, Diaz, Hendricks in that order winning all. Even though the #1 status is arguable with other fighters….Silva’s impromptu string of losses hurts him. His multiple skills as an athlete and fighter are clear and unequivocal.
Only three losses. One on a lucky haymaker. All but one decision was unanimous…..which means he dominated throughout. He had the stamina to go five rounds as he put on clinics. Not many fighters can go 5 rounds routinely and dominate. He dominated prolific college wrestlers at their own game, submitted Matt Hughes and BJ Penn. Fought Koshcek, Hughes, Serra, Fitch, Penn, Alves, Hardy, Shields, Condit, Diaz, Hendricks in that order winning all. Even though the #1 status is arguable with other fighters….Silva’s impromptu string of losses hurts him. His multiple skills as an athlete and fighter are clear and unequivocal.
GSP over Silva? A guy that stays years needing judges to win fights? His winnings are most by judges. This rankings is ridiculous.
GSP over Silva? A guy that stays years needing judges to win fights? His winnings are most by judges. This rankings is ridiculous.
A troublesome part of compiling Absolute rankings is determining a fair method of weighting (pardon the pun) the divisions against each other. As you can see, we are being more than fair to the lighter divisions given the standings of Edgar and Faber.
Cruz is knocking on the door at #27.
Is it possible to see more than just the top 25 absolute all time rankings?
A troublesome part of compiling Absolute rankings is determining a fair method of weighting (pardon the pun) the divisions against each other. As you can see, we are being more than fair to the lighter divisions given the standings of Edgar and Faber.
Cruz is knocking on the door at #27.
Absolute = Mighty Mouse and Dominick Cruz need to get in top 10.
Heavyweight = How is Werdum not #2?
Light Heavyweight = How is Wanderlei above Rampage and Shogun?
Middleweight = Romero needs to get in the top 10. How is Jacare below Sonnen and Marquart? Bisping deserves to be higher.
Welterweight = Jake Shields has to be above Fitch and where is Wonderboy?
Lightweight = Rafael Does Anjos is absolutely #1. Frankie and Henderson are above Penn.
Featherweight = Max Holloway needs to be top 10. Frankie Edgar and Conor McGregor are both top 3 with Aldo being #1 of course.
Bantamweight = How is Dillashaw below Barao? Dillashaw is #2.
Flyweight = Benavidez and Dodson are both top 3.
Women = Cyborg is #1. How are Holm and Joanna that low and how is Tate not top 5?
#1 Cyborg
#2 Rousey
#3 Joanna
#4 Tate
#5 Holm
Absolute = Mighty Mouse and Dominick Cruz need to get in top 10.
Heavyweight = How is Werdum not #2?
Light Heavyweight = How is Wanderlei above Rampage and Shogun?
Middleweight = Romero needs to get in the top 10. How is Jacare below Sonnen and Marquart? Bisping deserves to be higher.
Welterweight = Jake Shields has to be above Fitch and where is Wonderboy?
Lightweight = Rafael Does Anjos is absolutely #1. Frankie and Henderson are above Penn.
Featherweight = Max Holloway needs to be top 10. Frankie Edgar and Conor McGregor are both top 3 with Aldo being #1 of course.
Bantamweight = How is Dillashaw below Barao? Dillashaw is #2.
Flyweight = Benavidez and Dodson are both top 3.
Women = Cyborg is #1. How are Holm and Joanna that low and how is Tate not top 5?
#1 Cyborg
#2 Rousey
#3 Joanna
#4 Tate
#5 Holm
DJ is now #42
Relatively speaking, Flyweight is a weak division.
On last update, DJ was at #45 Absolute.. but I imagine he’ll be in the Top 40 on the next update.
Also.. DJ has been a top fighter for what, 3-4 years? Do some research on the careers of those in the Top 25…
Relatively speaking, Flyweight is a weak division.
On last update, DJ was at #45 Absolute.. but I imagine he’ll be in the Top 40 on the next update.
Also.. DJ has been a top fighter for what, 3-4 years? Do some research on the careers of those in the Top 25…
Not sure how your absolute or division dominance is figured, but your low placement or lack thereof regarding Demetrious Johnson is concerning to the formula
Not sure how your absolute or division dominance is figured, but your low placement or lack thereof regarding Demetrious Johnson is concerning to the formula
Crook to see Lyoto Machida get his due. I don’t think that Matt Hughes should be over jones though
You may think the rules are arbitrary but they apply equally to every fighter. I’m a huge Matt Hughes fan just as an example, but I don’t advocate modifying any rules to give Hughes an artificial advantage. So how does “fanboy-ism” factor into this?
don’t forget, your ratings software itself was written by fanboys!
I’m as big a Fightmatrix advocate as anyone, but it’s ridiculous that you guys seem to actually think that the system isn’t biased based on whatever arbitrary rules you used to create/weight/update the algorithm.
Crook to see Lyoto Machida get his due. I don’t think that Matt Hughes should be over jones though
You may think the rules are arbitrary but they apply equally to every fighter. I’m a huge Matt Hughes fan just as an example, but I don’t advocate modifying any rules to give Hughes an artificial advantage. So how does “fanboy-ism” factor into this?
don’t forget, your ratings software itself was written by fanboys!
I’m as big a Fightmatrix advocate as anyone, but it’s ridiculous that you guys seem to actually think that the system isn’t biased based on whatever arbitrary rules you used to create/weight/update the algorithm.
I mean, Women (Open) !!!
I mean, Women (Open) !!!
If by “fanboy’s” you mean our rating software…
If by “fanboy’s” you mean our rating software…
Ridiculous and unjust ranking! Decided by fanboy’s!!!
Ridiculous and unjust ranking! Decided by fanboy’s!!!
No
No Mighty Mouse in the absolute rankings?
No Mighty Mouse in the absolute rankings?
All-Time Rankings down for maintenance.. working on a bug fix (or exploit fix, if you will).
All-Time Rankings down for maintenance.. working on a bug fix (or exploit fix, if you will).
I’m too
LFC 42 – Legacy Fighting Championship 42. A very good fighter!!!!
LFC 42 – Legacy Fighting Championship 42. A very good fighter!!!!
It would be interesting to show past all-time rankings.
It would be interesting to show past all-time rankings.
You can’t.
Where can I view all-time rankings for past times? Thanks!
The problem here is Hendricks was gassed out byt the GSP fight. Second he LOST ! get over it yankee !. as Dan White ahs said many times , “do not leave it in the hands of the judges”. if this was non title fight then who knows. But the score cards said it all. Was it a close fight, YES.And on another note one does not have to have the best face face after a gith nor during. The Hendrik’ s punch’s landed but few of them. take a ook a this fight again bro. And Dan White? he is so much dis-respect full of the fighters who fight in the UFC. Not give GSP the belt by putting it round his waist after was a real slap in the face. More damage then anything Hendriks could have thrown. try being a class act like GSP and you get dammed for it. Act like a total goon like Henricks and you praise. that`s how most americans think. Oh yah forgot you won all thw world wars and more.
Goes in the books as a win.
GSP shouldn’t even be considered.
He got beat by Hendricks, but got a gift decision, then he ran away so he didn’t have to fight him again. That is NOT the actions of The Greatest Fighter of All Time.
Goes in the books as a win.
GSP shouldn’t even be considered.
He got beat by Hendricks, but got a gift decision, then he ran away so he didn’t have to fight him again. That is NOT the actions of The Greatest Fighter of All Time.
Your tone is silly.. 2 positions give you so much grief, really?
Your tone is silly.. 2 positions give you so much grief, really?
hahaha GSP number 1 wtf are you serious. In my eyes it should go anderson silva, jon jones then gsp
hahaha GSP number 1 wtf are you serious. In my eyes it should go anderson silva, jon jones then gsp
What are you on about? Incomprehensible.
What are you on about? Incomprehensible.
Your Argument Was Silva vs GSP But Ten At The End You Chose Liddell Or Couture???
Besides GSP Many Times Said He Would Take That Silva Fight But It Would Take A Year Of Training To Jump Up To The Middle Weight Because GSP Walks Around In The Upper 180’s & Silva Walks Around In The Lower 220’s
Fighters Can BULK Up Like MIR Tried To Do Against Lesnar Or They Cut Weight Like Lesnar Has To To Make The 165lb HW Limit
Your Argument Was Silva vs GSP But Ten At The End You Chose Liddell Or Couture???
Besides GSP Many Times Said He Would Take That Silva Fight But It Would Take A Year Of Training To Jump Up To The Middle Weight Because GSP Walks Around In The Upper 180’s & Silva Walks Around In The Lower 220’s
Fighters Can BULK Up Like MIR Tried To Do Against Lesnar Or They Cut Weight Like Lesnar Has To To Make The 165lb HW Limit
Have to look at that. My belief is ‘yes’, but w/ consideration to all divisions.. so it’s not apples to apples with the Men.
Have to look at that. My belief is ‘yes’, but w/ consideration to all divisions.. so it’s not apples to apples with the Men.
Are women included in the Peak Division Dominance calculations?
Are women included in the Peak Division Dominance calculations?
GSP deserves the #1 ranking. Nobody else has ever beaten that many top fighters, and he dominated most of them.
GSP deserves the #1 ranking. Nobody else has ever beaten that many top fighters, and he dominated most of them.
The p4p all time list is the biggest joke ever. GSP over SIlva? That’s the biggest crock ever. Especially since GSP was scared to fight Anderson. People always said that Anderson is too big for GSP, but no one said that when GSP fought Serra. And, Serra won the first fight. GSP was a great fighter, but he wasn’t the GOAT. I’d take Liddell or Couture over GSP.
The p4p all time list is the biggest joke ever. GSP over SIlva? That’s the biggest crock ever. Especially since GSP was scared to fight Anderson. People always said that Anderson is too big for GSP, but no one said that when GSP fought Serra. And, Serra won the first fight. GSP was a great fighter, but he wasn’t the GOAT. I’d take Liddell or Couture over GSP.
This is a bad way to see who should be the highest ranking mma fighter, especially since GSP’s later career was a snooze fest and Anderson Silva’s later career in his prime was fking amazing.
This is a bad way to see who should be the highest ranking mma fighter, especially since GSP’s later career was a snooze fest and Anderson Silva’s later career in his prime was fking amazing.
MMA is still too young and too tumultuous to do any kind of projections like that.
MMA is still too young and too tumultuous to do any kind of projections like that.
Have you considered posting long-term projections based on the ratings? IOW, using the ranking system and historical data to figure out the likelihood that the 6 – 0 Fighter X will be in the top 10 three years from now? Or in the all-time rankings ten years from now?
Have you considered posting long-term projections based on the ratings? IOW, using the ranking system and historical data to figure out the likelihood that the 6 – 0 Fighter X will be in the top 10 three years from now? Or in the all-time rankings ten years from now?
Personally, I think these rankings are very accurate. Yeah, Marquardt gets way too much credit and Weidman is an interesting case… but otherwise, there’s nothing to complain about.
Damn, Cro Cop gets NO respect on these rankings. Not on the all time Top 25? #9 heavyweight of all time? … SMFH. These rankings, overall, are a joke. “Division Dominance (Peak): 1. Chris Weidman” … Really? Ugh. Marquardt #2 Middleweight of all time? WHAT? Yasuhiro Urushitani, the greatest Flyweight of all time? …
Smfh. What a joke.
Damn, Cro Cop gets NO respect on these rankings. Not on the all time Top 25? #9 heavyweight of all time? … SMFH. These rankings, overall, are a joke. “Division Dominance (Peak): 1. Chris Weidman” … Really? Ugh. Marquardt #2 Middleweight of all time? WHAT? Yasuhiro Urushitani, the greatest Flyweight of all time? …
Smfh. What a joke.
Does anyone else feel that Mirko CroCop is the only superstar from that era that’s missing from the Absolute rankings?
Does anyone else feel that Mirko CroCop is the only superstar from that era that’s missing from the Absolute rankings?
It’s the whole… Womens MMA is really still in its infancy factor.
These rankings are “slower” to react to recent changes… I have no doubt you’ll see Rousey/Cyborg in the Top 5 soon enough.
i should clarify…out of whack a little assuming the difference bewteen #s is more than minute. If people next to each other could easily be swapped, then maybe not. Though, even though I don’t like her as a fighter, I’m surprised Cyborg isn’t ranked higher, unless her PED use was considered. She’s pretty dominant in the cage.
The Women’s rankings seem kinda out of whack.
It’s the whole… Womens MMA is really still in its infancy factor.
These rankings are “slower” to react to recent changes… I have no doubt you’ll see Rousey/Cyborg in the Top 5 soon enough.
i should clarify…out of whack a little assuming the difference bewteen #s is more than minute. If people next to each other could easily be swapped, then maybe not. Though, even though I don’t like her as a fighter, I’m surprised Cyborg isn’t ranked higher, unless her PED use was considered. She’s pretty dominant in the cage.
The Women’s rankings seem kinda out of whack.
Having the “peak DD” in All-Time is tough… because as long as the new #1 beats the old #1 while the old #1 is still in his prime… the new #1 will be higher ranked in all-time DD because the divisions keep getting stronger and the distance between #1 and the division norm will keep getting wider.
Yeah… I’d just associate a high DD ranking with dominant champion, weak division, or both. Neither is the case here.
It’s gotta be just the odd distribution of points among the top guys. Silva and Belfort must fall into the exclusion band, and everyone else in top 10 is pretty much in dead heat in the low 300’s.
Yeah… I’d just associate a high DD ranking with dominant champion, weak division, or both. Neither is the case here.
It’s gotta be just the odd distribution of points among the top guys. Silva and Belfort must fall into the exclusion band, and everyone else in top 10 is pretty much in dead heat in the low 300’s.
He’s the man that beat the man that beat the man…. etc.
Very strange to see Chris Weidman as #4 peak DD of all time. Even more odd is that his peak DD rating is higher than Anderson Silva’s peak.
He’s the man that beat the man that beat the man…. etc.
Very strange to see Chris Weidman as #4 peak DD of all time. Even more odd is that his peak DD rating is higher than Anderson Silva’s peak.
They disappeared for a day… back now.
What do you mean by “run off”?
The Absolute rankings appear to have run off.
The Absolute rankings appear to have run off.
Marquardt’s career seems to be finally winding down…he should start slidind down the all-time list over the next several months.
Even ignoring CroCop winning K1, the success he had in it before he went into MMA makes his MMA success more incredible.
Even ignoring CroCop winning K1, the success he had in it before he went into MMA makes his MMA success more incredible.
K-1 hasn’t been relavent in at least ten years.
It was a rather weak field by K-1 GP standards, compared to Mirko’s glory days. Wonder if he will retire now on a high note, having finally won a title.
CroCop winning K1! I know it’s a different combat sport but surely what this man has achieved in K1 makes his MMA successes even more impressive! If his place was switched with Josh Barnett’s in the heavyweight rankings they would be perfect.
CroCop winning K1! I know it’s a different combat sport but surely what this man has achieved in K1 makes his MMA successes even more impressive! If his place was switched with Josh Barnett’s in the heavyweight rankings they would be perfect.
How is Gilbert Melendez above Shogun when he hasn’t fought in the UFC? He hasn’t fought any of the top lightweights of the UFC yet he’s above Shogun who’s fought a who’s-who of the lightheavy weight division. How are Faber and Marquart above Shogun as well? Cheers, Mark.
It already works this way Mark.
If the light-heavyweight fighters and the heavyweight fighters were given more points for being in more challenging and tougher divisions, would this knock Anderson Silva off the top spot in the absolute rankings?
If the light-heavyweight fighters and the heavyweight fighters were given more points for being in more challenging and tougher divisions, would this knock Anderson Silva off the top spot in the absolute rankings?
I have 145.. while Gomes came in “over” at 149. This was not confirmed by a commission report.
what did rousey weigh for her 1st pro fight against gomes?
I have 145.. while Gomes came in “over” at 149. This was not confirmed by a commission report.
He’s ranked #37. He’s being held back a bit by only having three fights (two wins) in the division. He should get into the list before the end of the year though, assuming he gets another win… he’s just being throttled by some of the metrics.
He’s ranked #37. He’s being held back a bit by only having three fights (two wins) in the division. He should get into the list before the end of the year though, assuming he gets another win… he’s just being throttled by some of the metrics.
How close is Benavidez to the top 25 flyweight list?
It looks like some sort of changes in the system? I just noticed that Liddell passed Jackson at light heavyweight and Sherk passed Franklin yet again. Roussey just moved up two more spots as well.
That top 3 is pretty lofty like it is at LHW, but Rousey should get to #4 fairly quickly.
The real “run” is up now. Yesterday’s was an intermediate of sorts..
Nice to see Ronda finally listed.
Nice to see Ronda finally listed.
Because we got new fight data where his fights lasted a bit longer, thus bumping up his average.
Because we got new fight data where his fights lasted a bit longer, thus bumping up his average.
Why is Matt gabel no longer listed on shortest win average?
Why is Matt gabel no longer listed on shortest win average?
She should enter the top 25 next month… and then move up pretty quickly.
She should enter the top 25 next month… and then move up pretty quickly.
will rousey crack the top 25 now? 2/24/2013
I absolutely love this site! The rankings for each division are very near spot on! I’ve mentioned this before but the absolute division is the only one I think is inaccurate because it doesn’t take into account the difference in quality between the divisions. Faber, Marquart and Melendez above Shogun! Melendez hasn’t even fought Edgar/Maynard/Henderson/pettis/Diaz/Penn and he’s above Shogun!!! And CroCop has to be on the list. Barnett is on the list and how many men dominate barnett 3 times!! Top quality site though, keep up the good work.
I absolutely love this site! The rankings for each division are very near spot on! I’ve mentioned this before but the absolute division is the only one I think is inaccurate because it doesn’t take into account the difference in quality between the divisions. Faber, Marquart and Melendez above Shogun! Melendez hasn’t even fought Edgar/Maynard/Henderson/pettis/Diaz/Penn and he’s above Shogun!!! And CroCop has to be on the list. Barnett is on the list and how many men dominate barnett 3 times!! Top quality site though, keep up the good work.
FYI – Strawweight is at a limit of 120lb… or at least, that’s what we’re starting it at.
Now I’m wondering just how far down the list Cro Cop has slid… He must be 34th or worse- Dos Santos is 33rd and higher than Cro Cop in the all-time heavyweight rankings (and both of them have spent their entire mma careers at heavyweight, with no input from other divisions).
ps I appreciate your feedback 🙂
I know what you are saying but the rankings don’t take into account the fact that the middleweight division has always been a B class division with B level fighters. If CroCop was a middleweight he would have never lost. You can’t just assume that each division has the exact same quality of fighters. Even now the middlweight division is devoid of superstar talent apart form Anderson of course.
LOL… What does Crop Cop’s success in K-1 kickboxing have to do with his ranking on the all-time absolute MMA list? And like I already said, Cro Cop was a top quality MMA fighter for 4-5 years and was never higher than the number 3 guy in his division even then.
Meanwhile, Franklin was briefly #1 in his division and near the top for several years. Barnett has been a top 10 heavyweight for about 13 years (although it’s been several years since he’s beaten a top 10 heavyweight). Fitch was the #2 or #3 welterweight for about 6 years. I do think Marquardt is overrated, but even he was a top 10 middleweight for most of the last 10 or 12 years.
Basically, Cro Cop’s time near the top wasn’t long enough to justify him being on this list. Similar to Tito Ortiz, time has past him by and he fell off the list. Rich Franklin will soon follow him. And Fitch soon afterwards.
Barnett is on the list and Cro Cop destroyed him 3 times. Cro Cop was the most feared striker in the world, hanged with Fedor, dominated Big Nog before getting submitted, ended Wanderlei’s reign at the top, and carried out so many highlight reel knockouts – plus he crossed over from a different combat sport in which he was also successful in K1. Marquart, Frnaklin and Fitch haven’t doen anything near as impressive.
Also, Cro Cop’s MMA prime only lasted four or five years (and at best, he was the number #3 guy in his division during that time).
I don’t have any problems with Cro Cop being left left off, but I’ll never agree with Marquardt being way up there at #14.
Does anyone know why Barnett, Franklin, Marquart and Fitch are on the absolute list when CroCop isn’t? He is the only superstar missing from it. He was a far superior fighter to the 4 I just mentioned.
She’ll be ranked very soon.
She’ll be ranked very soon.
how close is rousey to the top 25?
how close is rousey to the top 25?
Thanks for the quick info.
Thanks for the quick info.
Cain #29, JDS #33
How close are Velasquez and Dos Santos to reaching the top 25 on the absolute list?
Cain #29, JDS #33
How close are Velasquez and Dos Santos to reaching the top 25 on the absolute list?
why isn’t ronda rousey ranked yet?
why isn’t ronda rousey ranked yet?
Come to think of it, Dos Santos and Velasquez should both reach the top four on the heavyweight list sometime in 2013, just before they enter the top 25 on the absolute list.
Come to think of it, Dos Santos and Velasquez should both reach the top four on the heavyweight list sometime in 2013, just before they enter the top 25 on the absolute list.
I’m guessing that Velasquez and Dos Santos will both be in the top four of the all-time heavyweight list within a couple of years. I’m also thinking that they will both reach the top 25 on the absolute list sometime in 2013.
Silva/GSP/Fedor/Hughes are going to have some staying power. They are the tier 1 legends of the sport.
I think the rest of those guys you see in the top 25 except for Aldo, Jon Jones and maybe Rashad and Melendez are going to get swallowed up. Only reason I list them as maybes is because I think they still have time left to do things…
Is it inevitable that the fighters at the top of the Absolute list will move down the list as the sport progresses and grows? Where do you think Fedor/GSP/Silva/Hughes/Big Nog will be on the list ten years from now?
Is it inevitable that the fighters at the top of the Absolute list will move down the list as the sport progresses and grows? Where do you think Fedor/GSP/Silva/Hughes/Big Nog will be on the list ten years from now?
BJ fighting outside of the division means nothing for his Lightweight ranking — it actually takes away from it because it means he spent time in other divisions that he could’ve spent at Lightweight. Notice BJ is ranked at Welterweight and also has points at Middleweight. Also notice BJ is higher in the Absolute ranking.
Gomi spent his entire career at Lightweight.
It’s actually pretty close between 1 and 2, but Gomi has it based on much, much more worthwhile longevity in the division. It’s like Sandy Koufax (BJ) vs. Nolan Ryan (Gomi).
Now, even if Penn never goes back to 155.. he COULD eventually catch Gomi. It’s unlikely, but possible — we do backfill data as it comes along and if Gomi tanks hard, even though we mostly discount past-prime mega losing.. it’s not totally discounted.
Ummm, Gomi over BJ? Whaaat? Makes no sense at all. BJ faced tougher competition, fought out of his weight class, held a UFC belt, dominated the lightweight division, is a two division UFC champ, and utterly DOMINATED Gomi. What did Gomi really do? Crush a bunch of cans and then get smoked by any haf decent fighter he fights in the UFC, that’s what.
Who is Rhonda? I’d expect RONDA to make her appearance on the list very soon. She has a whopping SIX fights.
wow Ms. rhonda not on the top 25 how many of her victims are on that list
wow Ms. rhonda not on the top 25 how many of her victims are on that list
Hmm Hector Lombard surpassed Tanner on this latest update.
At first glance, it may seem strange, but Tanner had a grand total of 5 wins at Middleweight. Yes, one was a UFC championship fight for a vacant belt.. against David Terrell, a 5-1 fighter.
Lombard has dozens of wins at Middleweight. Tanner may have achieved a higher peak, but it was extremely short.
Love this site, the rankings are so accurate… almost! Where is cro-cop in the pound-for-pound list? I feel he was a far superior fighter to marquart, franklin, barnett, etc… I don’t know if these rankings take into account that the middleweight division has always been far weaker than the light-heavyweight division. But other than that it’s a quality site!
We don’t really want to do that, because most viewers will think anything that happened since the last update was due to current fights, when in actuality, fluctuations on this list can and have been pretty wild and seemingly random.
Any chance you could show the number of spots a fighter moved up or down since the last update?
Thanks for the info. That’s about what I expected, they could reach the top 25 by the end of the year.
Jones 35, JDS 37
JCS, could you tell us where Dos Santos and Jones are ranked on the all-time absolute list?
Jones hasn’t spent enough time at or near the top of his division. Give it another 6-12 months.
Jones hasn’t spent enough time at or near the top of his division. Give it another 6-12 months.
I don’t understand why Jones isn’t ranked on Absolute.
3rd highest at his peak, with over 16 fights and he isn’t passed guys like Edgar who have had less fights, or guys like Machida who have had barely more fights but a LOT less notable wins than Jones?
Wow, Rampage has moved into first place on the light heavyweight list. I find that ranking at least plausible, but I suspect that if you polled on this issue you would get more votes for Chuck, Wand, and probably Jones than you would for Rampage. This seems to show the value of this method of ranking fighters — it brings out these sorts of things with subjective rankings usually miss. I think he has been underrated for most of his career anyway.
Fighters are rated in the divisions they fought, not in the division they weighed in at. He is nowhere near the greatest fighter in history. After his three years of “dominance”, you saw how successful he was when fighters started learning how to handle wrestling.
there’s a major issue with letting a computer pic the top fighters based on stats.
it’s being fed stats about fighters who fight within certain weightclasses. usually their own weight or a weight they cut down to.
problem is Kazushi Sakuraba is nowhere on the lists. He was 183lbs. BJ Penn’s walk around weight. the difference is he fought the best fighters in the world reguardless of weight, beating most of them. Not to mention he didn’t fight outpoint folks he always fought to finish. He is arguably the greatest fighter in history with 3 years of dominance under his belt and ending the Gracie unbeatable myth. Also beating 7 men who were UFC WW-HW champs aswell as 3 kings of Pancrase and a Dream GP champ.
Aldo finally caught Faber on the featherweight list…. well, it was always just a matter of time.
Highest absolute total for fighters not in any of the existing Top 25 lists.
This new list is sort of interesting, but I’d much rather see the all-time absolute list expanded to 50 fighters.
Interesting… what is the criteria for such a blended list?
I’m thinking of making this a new ranking in the all-time list. This is a Top 25 of all fighters not found in any of the Top 25s above. Sort of a “Best of the Rest”. Guys who didn’t quite make the Top 25.. or guys who spent time in many different divisions.
Norifumi Yamamoto
Carlos Newton
Manabu Yamada
Uchu Tatsumi
Jason DeLucia
Vladimir Matyushenko
Akihiro Gono
Ricco Rodriguez
Kiyoshi Tamura
Joe Doerksen
Gabriel Gonzaga
Thales Leites
Ikuhisa Minowa
Gilbert Yvel
Akitoshi Tamura
Heath Herring
Cheick Kongo
Josh Thomson
Antonio Silva
Joe Stevenson
Phillip Miller
Dan Severn
Denis Kang
Martin Kampmann
Jay Hieron
I’m thinking of making this a new ranking in the all-time list. This is a Top 25 of all fighters not found in any of the Top 25s above. Sort of a “Best of the Rest”. Guys who didn’t quite make the Top 25.. or guys who spent time in many different divisions.
Norifumi Yamamoto
Carlos Newton
Manabu Yamada
Uchu Tatsumi
Jason DeLucia
Vladimir Matyushenko
Akihiro Gono
Ricco Rodriguez
Kiyoshi Tamura
Joe Doerksen
Gabriel Gonzaga
Thales Leites
Ikuhisa Minowa
Gilbert Yvel
Akitoshi Tamura
Heath Herring
Cheick Kongo
Josh Thomson
Antonio Silva
Joe Stevenson
Phillip Miller
Dan Severn
Denis Kang
Martin Kampmann
Jay Hieron
This DD list is a little different.. you have to have some good tenure in the division to make the all-time list.
Will Benavidez make Peak Division Dominance Top 25?
Yes, Gary. Being top-ranked with stronger competition results in an increased standing… so it is slanted toward modern fighters in that aspect.
Sorry if answered already, but is this all-time list skewed, (intentionally or unintentionally), to favour guys who are more modern because there are more fighters to be measured against as time goes on?
Guys that seem lower, but were most certainly quite dominant in their time would include Vovchanchin, Menne, Frank Shamrock, Dan Severn, etc.
Would someone like Mousasi score higher because he’s in a bigger pond now, compared to when Frank Shamrock completely dominated his era?
It’s hard to imagine Mousasi being mentioned before Frank Shamrock in a conversation about all-time great LHWS, or Lesnar before Vovchanchin in the HWs, etc.
Thanks for the prompt reply. As always, it’s greatly appreciated.
Sanchez 39, Cruz 57… of course, Sanchez is probably peaked out.
Jcs, Could you tell us where Dominick Cruz and Diego Sanchez are ranked on the all-time absolute list?
Nice to see GSP in the #2 spot- it’s long overdue.
Did not expect Fedor to get overtaken…
Horn is #56 at HW All-Time. As you may know, for “current rankings”, we only have quarterly snapshots prior to a few years ago. Therefore, the resolution isn’t THAT precise in order to give you a valid ‘highest’ ever rank at HW. I do see he held positions around #20 a few times..
Did Horn ever get ranked as a Hw? What was the highest ranking he posted on current rankings as a Hw if he did?
Where would he feature on the career list as a heavyweight as well?
Thanks again.
Hendo’s accomplishment was for the career rankings, not the current rankings.. What are you asking for in regards to Horn?
JCS I was wondering if I could bother you to dig out a stat for me. Im doing a Hall of Fame on the armbar and Im thinking about Jeremy Horn.
You recently posted that Hendo was the 1st man to crack the top 50 in 3 devisions, I was wondering what Horn ranked at Hw at the highest, I know he drew with Severn and after he beat Liddell I could be wrong but he got another Hw win in UFC.
Was curious to know how high he got at Hw if it isnt a hastle to dig out the stats. Cheers mate.
Once a month, usually on the 2nd or 3rd.
Are these rankings automatically re-calculated once a fighter in the list was updated in the current MMA rankings?
Like JDS who has gone to #1 in the HW div, do you have to manually trigger the update in the all-time HW div or is it done automatically?
Update coming today. Improved precision on two metrics for division equalization and magnification of the top P4P fighters before divisions really existed. No real changes except for some old-timers like Royce moving up. May also cause shuffling in the overall.
#32
100 wins, true.. but how many are worth a damn? 5? Maybe? And that was when the sport was very weak.
One of the challenges in creating this list is determining how much effect that divisional strength has. What is better, being #3 in a division when there are 50 fighters in it, or being #6 in a division when there are 1000?
Where is Dan Severn on the Hw list?!!! 100 wins and the dude still can get his place in the top 25!
Do you know where he ranks in terms of the Hw all timers?
Cheers.
Update coming today. Improved precision on two metrics for division equalization and magnification of the top P4P fighters before divisions really existed. No real changes except for some old-timers like Royce moving up. May also cause shuffling in the overall.
#32
100 wins, true.. but how many are worth a damn? 5? Maybe? And that was when the sport was very weak.
One of the challenges in creating this list is determining how much effect that divisional strength has. What is better, being #3 in a division when there are 50 fighters in it, or being #6 in a division when there are 1000?
Absolutely, I’ve always thought that Gomi was somewhat overrated. In fact, I still believe that many fighters who fought mostly in Japan during their primes tend to be overrated. I know that you’ve made some adjustments to deal with this problem, but in my opinion, not enough.
That’s mostly true, but I cannot completely exclude it from consideration. It’s also kind of tough to gauge the primes of fighters that are still fighting… If it continues to be a problem I’ll take a look at it, though prime or no prime, I think this latest stint may have proven that Gomi would have had issues hanging in the UFC back in his prime. and personally, at this point I think 13th is better than 8th for him IMO.
I thought losses at the end of a career wasn’t supposed to cause a former great to spiral downwards in the rankings?
I also agree with it.. and not sure why it happened. All I can figure is that this latest loss sent Gomi spiraling on one (or more) of the metrics we use to derive these rankings.
Thanks for the quick reply.
And I hadn’t even noticed that Gomi had dropped several spots (but i do agree with it).
Some notes about the Absolute…
– Anderson and Fedor are still awfully close, in fact, a fluctuation could see Fedor jump atop momentarily… However, it’s not likely to happen.
– GSP has a ways to go to take #2.
– Gomi took a major dump in this latest update.
– Evans is #27, Hioki is #30, Edgar #32, Koscheck #44 — Edgar and Evans have more momentum than the other two IMO.
In fact, Hatsu Hioki should be closing in on the top 25 as well.
Any idea how close Rashad Evans, Frankie Edgar and Josh Koscheck are to entering the all-time absolute list? They must be getting close.
In fact, I think Evans was briefly listed before a recent update (or am I wrong?).
I also agree with it.. and not sure why it happened. All I can figure is that this latest loss sent Gomi spiraling on one (or more) of the metrics we use to derive these rankings.
Any idea how close Rashad Evans, Frankie Edgar and Josh Koscheck are to entering the all-time absolute list? They must be getting close.
In fact, I think Evans was briefly listed before a recent update (or am I wrong?).
It’s nice to see that Aldo finally made the Absolute list. I’d expect him to to move up very rapidly over the next year or so. I also expect him to replace Faber as #1 on the all-time featherweight list sometime next year.
All-time rankings down for a few hours..
Cardella has never been anywhere close to #8. He’s not even ranked currently.
Where did you see that info?
I am being told that a Phil Cardella is ranked #8 in the world. When I see him on your sight it is 458. So which is true? Was at one point in time ranked #8? Thank you in advance for your help? Best regards,
Mike Almstead
It’s not a penalty per say… but fighters at the top of today’s lists are going to rack up points quicker than those who stood at the top of lists from years ago when the divisional depth was weaker. This is a very fine line.
jcs,
I have a question about the all-time lists. Previously you’ve indicated that there is a penalty of some sort given to fighters who dominated in the early days of MMA. How severe is the penalty? If I had to guess, I’d say that it isn’t nearly severe enough. It seems to me that dominating a division of maybe two or three dozen fighters should only be worth a fraction of the points that a fighters gets by dominating when there are several hundred active fighters in the division.
Personally, I think this sort of modification would solve most of this site’s problems.
It’s not a penalty per say… but fighters at the top of today’s lists are going to rack up points quicker than those who stood at the top of lists from years ago when the divisional depth was weaker. This is a very fine line.
jcs,
I have a question about the all-time lists. Previously you’ve indicated that there is a penalty of some sort given to fighters who dominated in the early days of MMA. How severe is the penalty? If I had to guess, I’d say that it isn’t nearly severe enough. It seems to me that dominating a division of maybe two or three dozen fighters should only be worth a fraction of the points that a fighters gets by dominating when there are several hundred active fighters in the division.
Personally, I think this sort of modification would solve most of this site’s problems.
I need a QA department.. fixed an issue in the Absolute ranks. I also think I’m missing a sort order somewhere in the calculations — i’m starting to think some of these fluctuations are caused by random ordering before some kind of calc. To be continued..
I need a QA department.. fixed an issue in the Absolute ranks. I also think I’m missing a sort order somewhere in the calculations — i’m starting to think some of these fluctuations are caused by random ordering before some kind of calc. To be continued..
These all-time rankings just keep getting better all the time. I don’t really think Marquardt and Melendez deserve to be on the absolute list, but that’s just my opinion. Mostly, the rankings seem pretty darn accurate.
The Top 3 at LHW is just a never-ending fluctuation. Hopefully Rampage will take the lead and run with it.
These all-time rankings just keep getting better all the time. I don’t really think Marquardt and Melendez deserve to be on the absolute list, but that’s just my opinion. Mostly, the rankings seem pretty darn accurate.
I started out with boxing. In fact, I assisted BoxRec with their rating software before I created FightMatrix.
I don’t necessarily agree with the Ali/Liddell, Gomi/Louis comparisons though. If we’re going with Heavyweights, I’d probably compare Liddell to Floyd Patterson and Gomi to Holmes.
But anyway, I hear what you’re saying about Sakuraba. These rankings feed primarily off of divisional accomplishments (P4P is included), but perhaps there isn’t enough direct head-to-head influence. Though, had Sakuraba beat enough guys at their primes, he would’ve been ranked higher, longer, and thus resulted in more points. Matchmaking also killed him. If he had fought at Middleweight his whole career, we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Another interesting topic is how to handle the old ‘open weight’ matches where both guys were say.. 180-190 pounds. If I have the data, I set the bout to the correct division. If I don’t, I usually will not assume and just set it to HW. Better data = better results.
JCS cheers for the response, I ment Royce was top p4p in the world and undefeated in their fight. Makes sence he was p4p number 1 after winning maby even going in to the 1st Wanderlei fight he might have been p4p number 1 again then too?
From the start of MMA there havnt been that many guys seen as top p4p fighter. I dont have an Idea how you could change the rankings to reflect this but as Koqebwix said fighting outside your weight class maby should have more effect on the rankings.
It could maby take the weight they have averaged at or been at most, say Saku and Gracie Mw, beating Dan Severn, Randleman, Ken Shamrock, Belfort etc.. should count for a lot.
Im guessing this wouldnt work because everyone was looked at as one weight class but but how do you treat wins like Hendo vs Fedor currently? Was he credited more for beating a guy outside his weight class more than a guy of the exact ranking of Fedor at Lhw?
Ive no Idea about the career end point and I suppose it can only be applied to guys who have officially hung up the gloves, someone really active like Severn doesnt and might not ever have a career end point at this rate.
Ive been trying to think about the career end thing but everything I come up with wouldnt work! I see how tough this must have been to do! But I dont know that it doesnt need looked at….
Bad comparison but in all time boxing rankings Tyson isnt there and for good reason because as good as he was in his prime he fought on and lost to guys like Kevin McBride and Danny Williams. Roy Jones Jr should have been the great of a generation because he didnt call it a day at the right time, this ruins a legacy (see Ken Shamrock!) and I dont mind if your rankings dont have a career end factor it makes sence to not have one in a way.
I think if Sakus recent losses are bad enough to overturn what he did in his career that fair enough but I think at a glance Smaller guys havnt got it fair in some rankings, most MMA diehards I know would say Saku, Frank Shammy, Gracie on an All time great list and I wonder if there was a way to reflect weight more of old fights would they come into the rankings or are people having rose tinted glasses.
Again if you look at Boxing rankings they reward guys for who you beat insted of Long Runs, I dont know if you can prioritise what gives a fighters more points to tweek things and see how it looks but I thought Look at Liddell as Ali, he fought the best possible opposition in the golden era of the best devision then, Gomi as Joe Louis Joe Louis has a better career record and held the title for far longer yet most people have Ali over Louis… I dont know if you follow boxing or that made sence but I think a fighter is firstly Judged on who he beat more than any other factor.
Cheers.
Right Thonolan.. and that’s especially true now, as I’ve fixed that loophole. As a result, you’ll notice some modest changes, one being CroCop’s entry (likely temporary) in the Absolute 25.
“What if Anderson Silva stays at the top for another 5 years, then continues to fight for another 15 years, loosing mosts of his fights, even against average fighters?
If losses count, he will leave the top position (and maybe the top 20)… even if no other fighter achieved what he did.”
I don’t think it works that way. Under this scenario, Silva would eventually drop out of the current rankings and would cease to continue building up points. But no matter how many times he lost, I don’t think he would lose any of the all-time points that he’s already accumulated.
I started out with boxing. In fact, I assisted BoxRec with their rating software before I created FightMatrix.
I don’t necessarily agree with the Ali/Liddell, Gomi/Louis comparisons though. If we’re going with Heavyweights, I’d probably compare Liddell to Floyd Patterson and Gomi to Holmes.
But anyway, I hear what you’re saying about Sakuraba. These rankings feed primarily off of divisional accomplishments (P4P is included), but perhaps there isn’t enough direct head-to-head influence. Though, had Sakuraba beat enough guys at their primes, he would’ve been ranked higher, longer, and thus resulted in more points. Matchmaking also killed him. If he had fought at Middleweight his whole career, we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation.
Another interesting topic is how to handle the old ‘open weight’ matches where both guys were say.. 180-190 pounds. If I have the data, I set the bout to the correct division. If I don’t, I usually will not assume and just set it to HW. Better data = better results.
JCS cheers for the response, I ment Royce was top p4p in the world and undefeated in their fight. Makes sence he was p4p number 1 after winning maby even going in to the 1st Wanderlei fight he might have been p4p number 1 again then too?
From the start of MMA there havnt been that many guys seen as top p4p fighter. I dont have an Idea how you could change the rankings to reflect this but as Koqebwix said fighting outside your weight class maby should have more effect on the rankings.
It could maby take the weight they have averaged at or been at most, say Saku and Gracie Mw, beating Dan Severn, Randleman, Ken Shamrock, Belfort etc.. should count for a lot.
Im guessing this wouldnt work because everyone was looked at as one weight class but but how do you treat wins like Hendo vs Fedor currently? Was he credited more for beating a guy outside his weight class more than a guy of the exact ranking of Fedor at Lhw?
Ive no Idea about the career end point and I suppose it can only be applied to guys who have officially hung up the gloves, someone really active like Severn doesnt and might not ever have a career end point at this rate.
Ive been trying to think about the career end thing but everything I come up with wouldnt work! I see how tough this must have been to do! But I dont know that it doesnt need looked at….
Bad comparison but in all time boxing rankings Tyson isnt there and for good reason because as good as he was in his prime he fought on and lost to guys like Kevin McBride and Danny Williams. Roy Jones Jr should have been the great of a generation because he didnt call it a day at the right time, this ruins a legacy (see Ken Shamrock!) and I dont mind if your rankings dont have a career end factor it makes sence to not have one in a way.
I think if Sakus recent losses are bad enough to overturn what he did in his career that fair enough but I think at a glance Smaller guys havnt got it fair in some rankings, most MMA diehards I know would say Saku, Frank Shammy, Gracie on an All time great list and I wonder if there was a way to reflect weight more of old fights would they come into the rankings or are people having rose tinted glasses.
Again if you look at Boxing rankings they reward guys for who you beat insted of Long Runs, I dont know if you can prioritise what gives a fighters more points to tweek things and see how it looks but I thought Look at Liddell as Ali, he fought the best possible opposition in the golden era of the best devision then, Gomi as Joe Louis Joe Louis has a better career record and held the title for far longer yet most people have Ali over Louis… I dont know if you follow boxing or that made sence but I think a fighter is firstly Judged on who he beat more than any other factor.
Cheers.
Right Thonolan.. and that’s especially true now, as I’ve fixed that loophole. As a result, you’ll notice some modest changes, one being CroCop’s entry (likely temporary) in the Absolute 25.
“What if Anderson Silva stays at the top for another 5 years, then continues to fight for another 15 years, loosing mosts of his fights, even against average fighters?
If losses count, he will leave the top position (and maybe the top 20)… even if no other fighter achieved what he did.”
I don’t think it works that way. Under this scenario, Silva would eventually drop out of the current rankings and would cease to continue building up points. But no matter how many times he lost, I don’t think he would lose any of the all-time points that he’s already accumulated.
1 – Losses have to count. There’s no way around this, other than a 100% re-design of the all-time rankings (not gonna happen).
2 – The overall strength has to count for something. Otherwise, you’d have guys like Erik Paulson near the top of the Middleweight list.
3 – I realize this adversely affects the prestige of a few fighters, but I don’t have enough old data to even begin to fairly compensate.
4 – Thanks!
I’ve got a fair routine in place to exclude some of the extreme past prime cases from a few of the metrics. Minor change, probably for the better, but will result in even stranger fluctuations..
I updated the rankings with this change, though the top date didn’t change… Ah well. This minor change had very little effect on the fighters that I thought it would affect.
I know that making a computer calculated ranking system is very difficult.
There are always some exeptions and extreme cases to deal with…
Here are 3 ideas (and arguments) I wish to throw in:
1) LOSSES
I think the “all times” rankings should not count losses at all.
Why?
What if Anderson Silva stays at the top for another 5 years, then continues to fight for another 15 years, loosing mosts of his fights, even against average fighters?
If losses count, he will leave the top position (and maybe the top 20)… even if no other fighter achieved what he did.
And now imagine that by this time, JSP stays at the top for another 5 years too, then retires.
If losses counts, he will surely be way above Silva in the p4p ranking.
For what? Watching television while Anderson is in the ring?
I think that what a fighter has done can’t be undone. This is the purpose of “all times” rankings.
There’s no reason why loosing some fights (even against my little sister) should undo any achievement made.
However, I you consider this option, you will need to do another adjustment: Consecutive wins must count far better than wins followed (or preceeded) by losses.
So losses WILL count, bur only by reducing the effect of nearby wins.
This should prevent fighters loosing half the time from being ranked as high as fighters who always win.
2) MMA WAS WEAK
Just forget it.
I know it is true, but this should not got into account.
It’s like saying “Rod Laver is not so great because tennis was weak in the sixties”.
Of course if he steps to a time portal and plays against some average guy of the 21st century, he will loose, but that’s not the question in an “all time best” ranking…
If you drop the “mma was weak” rule, I think your ranking will include more legends and exclude some “probably future legends”.
3) WEIGHT DIFFERENCE
This should be taken into account, at least in the p4p rankings…
In the old days, fighting a guy 20 (30, 50…) pounds heavier was very common.
“Extreme case” test:
Imagine that JSP starts to fight some heavywheights: A win over Dos Santos will be more impressive than a win over Diaz, no?
If the ranking ignore weight difference, Dos Santos = Diaz
And worse, Diaz > Struve…
In my opinion, the JSP vs Dos Santos theorical fight is not simply a fight for JSP in the heavyweight division.
4) THANKS FOR YOUR GREAT WORK
We all love rankings, and there will never be a perfect system… so there will always be some guy like me telling you “Where’s my favourite? This list sucks”. 🙂
I know that making a computer calculated ranking system is very difficult.
There are always some exeptions and extreme cases to deal with…
Here are 3 ideas (and arguments) I wish to throw in:
1) LOSSES
I think the “all times” rankings should not count losses at all.
Why?
What if Anderson Silva stays at the top for another 5 years, then continues to fight for another 15 years, loosing mosts of his fights, even against average fighters?
If losses count, he will leave the top position (and maybe the top 20)… even if no other fighter achieved what he did.
And now imagine that by this time, JSP stays at the top for another 5 years too, then retires.
If losses counts, he will surely be way above Silva in the p4p ranking.
For what? Watching television while Anderson is in the ring?
I think that what a fighter has done can’t be undone. This is the purpose of “all times” rankings.
There’s no reason why loosing some fights (even against my little sister) should undo any achievement made.
However, I you consider this option, you will need to do another adjustment: Consecutive wins must count far better than wins followed (or preceeded) by losses.
So losses WILL count, bur only by reducing the effect of nearby wins.
This should prevent fighters loosing half the time from being ranked as high as fighters who always win.
2) MMA WAS WEAK
Just forget it.
I know it is true, but this should not got into account.
It’s like saying “Rod Laver is not so great because tennis was weak in the sixties”.
Of course if he steps to a time portal and plays against some average guy of the 21st century, he will loose, but that’s not the question in an “all time best” ranking…
If you drop the “mma was weak” rule, I think your ranking will include more legends and exclude some “probably future legends”.
3) WEIGHT DIFFERENCE
This should be taken into account, at least in the p4p rankings…
In the old days, fighting a guy 20 (30, 50…) pounds heavier was very common.
“Extreme case” test:
Imagine that JSP starts to fight some heavywheights: A win over Dos Santos will be more impressive than a win over Diaz, no?
If the ranking ignore weight difference, Dos Santos = Diaz
And worse, Diaz > Struve…
In my opinion, the JSP vs Dos Santos theorical fight is not simply a fight for JSP in the heavyweight division.
4) THANKS FOR YOUR GREAT WORK
We all love rankings, and there will never be a perfect system… so there will always be some guy like me telling you “Where’s my favourite? This list sucks”. 🙂
This is all computerized, like the current rankings, but obviously the calculation is much different as we’re trying to summarize entire careers. In addition, we’re trying to balance performances with longevity – an unexpectedly difficult task given the varying frequencies of fights, opponents, etc.
Sakuraba may have been #1 P4P (though I’m not sure which Gracie win you are referring to), but the calculations here are derived from estimated divisional rankings. Sakuraba is definitely a unique case, in that he was never really at the top of a division for more than a fight or two, but bounced around divisions and had good wins, albeit for a limited time.
As for Liddell/Gomi, Liddells span at or near the top of the division lasted about 5 years. Gomi’s lasted nearly 9. Yes, 9. Gomi rose to the top of 155 quickly, because it WAS very weak. Yes, we do handle this also — this is the same reason why Royce Gracie is so low, because MMA as a whole was weak at that point. As you see, there are many variables here. Did Liddell have ‘bigger’ wins, yes, but his stay at the top was nowhere near as long. Arguing over 5 positions in the absolute ranking is silly when you think of how many fighters participated in the sport’s history.
I do admit, Gomi seems a few positions high, but he’s stalled and may even drop, while he’ll almost surely get passed up by Hendo, and some others.
Another issue is the ‘career end’ stages are being considered. I just don’t know how to best handle this. Should we be counting Liddell’s last few fights, even though he had a win over Wanderlei in between? It’s just very tough.
I think you can argue that the modifications which should be made are:
A – A fair way to exclude the extreme cases where fighters stick around way too long.
B – Slightly enhance the strength of head-to-head.
These are ideas I’ve been toying with before you started posting.
Was Saku not the p4p number 1 fighter when he beat Gracie or did I imagine that? I think thats why I regard him so highly. Maby I wildly over rate him because Im a really big fan but I could have sworn he was p4p number 1 and even a big favorite before he faced Wandy. I did a seminar with Wandy and he said going into the 1st fight Saku was regarded as the best fighter inthe world then….
Saku aside When you do Liddells wins and losses to good guys there
Couture (well only include him once as they are 2-1)
Tito X2
Wanderlei
Belfort
Randleman
Overeem
Babalu X2
Bustamante
Pele
Mezger
lost to
Rampage X2
Evans
Shogun
Rich
Jardine
So his Win/Loss list of decent figthers is twice as long as Gomi’s showing he has faced twice as many good fighters and has a much stronger win/loss percentage while doing so
Not to single out Gomi and I appreciate the replies but just wanting to see the justification for a few weirdly placed guys….
Again whatever forumla you have for the current fighters is superb but the all time ones seems a little off, do you see what I mean when comparing Liddell and Gomi? Have you made some sort of computerised programme that ranks them all for you based on cold hard stats or do you get much imput into it yourself? Cheers mate.
It’s got a little to do with head-to-head. It’s got a lot to do with career success and being ranked highly for an extended period of time. Diaz was not a loss, it was a no contest. Penn, Florian, Hellboy, all top 10 lightweights all-time. Guida may end up in the Top 20.
Sakuraba had a few good years and never held and defended a top spot in a division.
I’m not saying these rankings are perfect, but if you’re suggesting Sakuraba should be higher ranked than Gomi… well, I’d have to strongly disagree.
Isnt it about who you beat and loose to more than anything? To sum up Gomi’s career, there was a good bit of can crushing and against top opposition he went
Guida : Loss
Florian : Loss
Penn : Loss
Hellboy : Loss
Diaz : Loss
Ishida: Win
Pulver : Win
You could count Baron as a good win I guess but he would be lower class than the rest of the list and Aurelio he went 1-1 with (loosing more convincingly than he won)
and he is rated over Liddell etc? I could probabally name 30 fighters with a better head to head record against similar quality of opponent… What is the actual system because his quality of oppnent was poor throughout his career and his head to head record is well terrible in fairness.
Dont get me wrong im a massive Gomi fan, his fights are epic to watch but 8th best of all time over Hendo or Liddell… his rankings looks so wrong to me.
This is all computerized, like the current rankings, but obviously the calculation is much different as we’re trying to summarize entire careers. In addition, we’re trying to balance performances with longevity – an unexpectedly difficult task given the varying frequencies of fights, opponents, etc.
Sakuraba may have been #1 P4P (though I’m not sure which Gracie win you are referring to), but the calculations here are derived from estimated divisional rankings. Sakuraba is definitely a unique case, in that he was never really at the top of a division for more than a fight or two, but bounced around divisions and had good wins, albeit for a limited time.
As for Liddell/Gomi, Liddells span at or near the top of the division lasted about 5 years. Gomi’s lasted nearly 9. Yes, 9. Gomi rose to the top of 155 quickly, because it WAS very weak. Yes, we do handle this also — this is the same reason why Royce Gracie is so low, because MMA as a whole was weak at that point. As you see, there are many variables here. Did Liddell have ‘bigger’ wins, yes, but his stay at the top was nowhere near as long. Arguing over 5 positions in the absolute ranking is silly when you think of how many fighters participated in the sport’s history.
I do admit, Gomi seems a few positions high, but he’s stalled and may even drop, while he’ll almost surely get passed up by Hendo, and some others.
Another issue is the ‘career end’ stages are being considered. I just don’t know how to best handle this. Should we be counting Liddell’s last few fights, even though he had a win over Wanderlei in between? It’s just very tough.
I think you can argue that the modifications which should be made are:
A – A fair way to exclude the extreme cases where fighters stick around way too long.
B – Slightly enhance the strength of head-to-head.
These are ideas I’ve been toying with before you started posting.
Gomi was a top-ranked 155er for almost a decade.
Just a thought but Maby the absolute rankings need slightly different Criteria, Gomi’s career has also gone down the sh1tter as well and he achieved a lot less than Saku ever did in terms of who he beat. He hasn’t many Great career wins and even if you overlook the Diaz loss has a poor head to head record with ranked fighters. Saku on the other hand has been in with much better opponents and has a better head to head record with greats.
Saku in my head should at least be top 10, the Current rankings if say number 3 Mw moves to Lhw he might be ranked at 5th… this shows that fighting bigger guys is harder and should maby be shown somehow in the absolute rankings. I think maby its something to consider in an eara where weight classes werent as defined?
Was Saku not the p4p number 1 fighter when he beat Gracie or did I imagine that? I think thats why I regard him so highly. Maby I wildly over rate him because Im a really big fan but I could have sworn he was p4p number 1 and even a big favorite before he faced Wandy. I did a seminar with Wandy and he said going into the 1st fight Saku was regarded as the best fighter inthe world then….
Saku aside When you do Liddells wins and losses to good guys there
Couture (well only include him once as they are 2-1)
Tito X2
Wanderlei
Belfort
Randleman
Overeem
Babalu X2
Bustamante
Pele
Mezger
lost to
Rampage X2
Evans
Shogun
Rich
Jardine
So his Win/Loss list of decent figthers is twice as long as Gomi’s showing he has faced twice as many good fighters and has a much stronger win/loss percentage while doing so
Not to single out Gomi and I appreciate the replies but just wanting to see the justification for a few weirdly placed guys….
Again whatever forumla you have for the current fighters is superb but the all time ones seems a little off, do you see what I mean when comparing Liddell and Gomi? Have you made some sort of computerised programme that ranks them all for you based on cold hard stats or do you get much imput into it yourself? Cheers mate.
It’s got a little to do with head-to-head. It’s got a lot to do with career success and being ranked highly for an extended period of time. Diaz was not a loss, it was a no contest. Penn, Florian, Hellboy, all top 10 lightweights all-time. Guida may end up in the Top 20.
Sakuraba had a few good years and never held and defended a top spot in a division.
I’m not saying these rankings are perfect, but if you’re suggesting Sakuraba should be higher ranked than Gomi… well, I’d have to strongly disagree.
Isnt it about who you beat and loose to more than anything? To sum up Gomi’s career, there was a good bit of can crushing and against top opposition he went
Guida : Loss
Florian : Loss
Penn : Loss
Hellboy : Loss
Diaz : Loss
Ishida: Win
Pulver : Win
You could count Baron as a good win I guess but he would be lower class than the rest of the list and Aurelio he went 1-1 with (loosing more convincingly than he won)
and he is rated over Liddell etc? I could probabally name 30 fighters with a better head to head record against similar quality of opponent… What is the actual system because his quality of oppnent was poor throughout his career and his head to head record is well terrible in fairness.
Dont get me wrong im a massive Gomi fan, his fights are epic to watch but 8th best of all time over Hendo or Liddell… his rankings looks so wrong to me.
Oh my, and Dan Hardy is there…
For what? Nice haircut ?
I love the guy, but… this is All-time best fighters, no?
In these lists I see 7 fighters Sakuraba has beaten… but no Sakuraba 🙂
Even Royce Gracie is in it !
A guy who won only 2 fights after UFC 4 (against fighters who lost nearly all their fights)
His only “great” wins are against Shamrock and Severn…
Oh my, and Dan Hardy is there…
For what? Nice haircut ?
I love the guy, but… this is All-time best fighters, no?
In these lists I see 7 fighters Sakuraba has beaten… but no Sakuraba 🙂
Even Royce Gracie is in it !
A guy who won only 2 fights after UFC 4 (against fighters who lost nearly all their fights)
His only “great” wins are against Shamrock and Severn…
There are some things affecting Sakuraba that are not normally seen:
1 He bounced between divisions very frequently.
2 Some of his biggest name wins came against those fighters before they hit their primes.
3 MMA was weak when he was at his best.
4 He should have retired years ago.
—-
#1 is being accounted for. #2 causes many to overrated him and you could argue that in this type of system, he is not getting proper credit. #3 affects his rating negatively, as does #4. These are CAREER-long rankings and I do not have any logic in place to not penalize a fighter if he hangs around (in this case -WAY-) past his prime. The penalty he receives as a result of #4 is small, but is there.
In any case, he’s just outside the Top 25 at Light Heavy.
Sorry if its been asked before but where is Sakuraba? Before loosing to Igor surely he was p4p number 1 or close to it? Filho and Gomi over him…. I really like the current rankings I think your doing a great job but the all time ones confuse me.
where is #22 on the division dominance list?
You saw an incomplete update. Sorry for the confusion.
Probably have it out later today.
I really do cringe at the thought of DeLucia, Mezger and Kondo being on the all-time heavyweight list. I’m not sure Schlitt, Rutten and Funaki belong there, either. I realize that it’s not going to happen, but I actually wish that you’d ignore Pancrase’s open-hand era altogether. At the very least you could weight it so these guys didn’t get so much credit for beating a bunch of mediorcre, blown-up welterweight and middleweights with silly rules.
I know the routine- I fully expect a few small changes at most.
I know I’ve said this before, but the way these rankings calculate is more like a rolling average, whereas the current rankings show more immediate, harsh changes.
In other words, I wouldn’t expect massive changes tomorrow.
I’ll be looking forward to the new rankings.
New all-time rankings will be released this week — probably tomorrow.
“accomplishments in all divisions”
Will (did) we see some movement upward for Henderson for his victory over Fedor?
Nothing has changed except for historical data refinement. I feel that with another win, Anderson will probably lock it up…
I see that Anderson has dropped backed to #2 in the all-time absolute rankings. I’m assuming that this is very temporary?
Nothing has changed except for historical data refinement. I feel that with another win, Anderson will probably lock it up…
He didn’t necessarily peak .. his division lead peaked.
Just how the f did Anderson peak a month ago?
He peaked around the beginning of 09′.
[…] All-Time MMA Rankings […]
Here’s another guess: Liddell will drop out of the top 20 within the next 12 to 18 months.
Here’s another guess: Liddell will drop out of the top 20 within the next 12 to 18 months.
I don’t make guesses on these lists anymore =), but Faber has a lot of room between himself and Aldo.
It’s nice to see Aldo moving up the featherweight list. It looks like he’ll catch Faber sometime next year (assuming he doesn’t move up in weight before then). He should reach top 25 on the absolute list next year as well.
I just realized that Anderson Silva has finally passed Fedor Emelianenko on the all-time absolute list. I’m guessing that GSP will take the #2 spot before the end of the year.
Not gonna happen anytime soon, wouldn’t make too much sense anyhow as we don’t do all-time women divisional lists.
Just add a women’s divisional dominance catagory.
I see LaRosa got into the Division Dominance… I think I’ll restrict it to Men’s.
Not gonna happen anytime soon, wouldn’t make too much sense anyhow as we don’t do all-time women divisional lists.
Just add a women’s divisional dominance catagory.
[…] […]
I think I’m going to run with this programming for the foreseeable future. I don’t like making so many changes, even though it does not affect the bulk of the rankings. Still, I think the recent expansion and code changes have further improved the rankings.
Part of me thinks the latest head-to-head impact should be strengthened or tweaked slightly, but let’s see how this pans out over the next several months.
I’ll go out on a limb and predict that both Jorgensen and Faber will crack the top ten at bantamweight by the end of this year.
Some very interesting changes. Some are definitely for the better (Schilt, Kunioku). I’m not so sure about some of the other changes (Sonnen, Sherk, Pulver). As for Sakurai, I’m surprised but I don’t really disagree.
I think I’m going to run with this programming for the foreseeable future. I don’t like making so many changes, even though it does not affect the bulk of the rankings. Still, I think the recent expansion and code changes have further improved the rankings.
Part of me thinks the latest head-to-head impact should be strengthened or tweaked slightly, but let’s see how this pans out over the next several months.
I’ll go out on a limb and predict that both Jorgensen and Faber will crack the top ten at bantamweight by the end of this year.
First iteration of head-to-head impact on rankings are in. Very good changes IMO.
You mentioned the USA’s dominance at welterweight… You’re correct, but what surprises me is that Brazil only has one guy in the top 20.
Even stranger, every single fighter on the bantamweight top 20 all-time list if from either Japan or the USA.
Rest assured, I’m working on a resolve 🙂
“…Semmy Schilt is one of the most overrated fighters on the rankings (go figure)…”
LOL… I’ve been telling you that for awhile now.
First iteration of head-to-head impact on rankings are in. Very good changes IMO.
You mentioned the USA’s dominance at welterweight… You’re correct, but what surprises me is that Brazil only has one guy in the top 20.
Even stranger, every single fighter on the bantamweight top 20 all-time list if from either Japan or the USA.
Rest assured, I’m working on a resolve 🙂
“…Semmy Schilt is one of the most overrated fighters on the rankings (go figure)…”
LOL… I’ve been telling you that for awhile now.
I thought you would enjoy it.
I’m sure it will allow more issues to reveal themselves, but I figured we were ready for some expansion.
The American dominance at Welterweight is pretty amazing… I just noticed that.
Furthermore, eventually, I plan on incorporating a direct impact on the rankings based on head-to-head match ups with other ranked fighters. I feel this is an important cog that is sometimes overlooked by the equation, especially for prolific fighters of the early MMA scene. It will also help determine who is overrated and who is underrated IMO.
The first iteration shows Semmy Schilt is one of the most overrated fighters on the rankings (go figure)…
I love the expansion. Very interesting stuff.
I love the expansion. Very interesting stuff.
A couple of notes: I was a bit surprised to see that Tito Ortiz had fallen completely out of the top 25. On the other hand, it was nice to see Fitch, Torres and Shields moving up the list.
Hopefully the old Pancrase oddities are put to bed sooner, rather than later.
I think this is one of the strongest sets we’ve put out.
I know it must seem as if I do nothing but complain, but it’s only because I’m very fond of this site and would like to see it reach it’s full potential. Anyways, keep up the good work.
11 Urijah Faber (+1)
12 Chuck Liddell (-1)
13 Nate Marquardt
14 Quinton Jackson
15 Shinya Aoki (+5)
16 Josh Barnett (-1)
17 Lyoto Machida (+2)
18 Mauricio Rua (-1)
19 Rich Franklin (+3)
20 Paulo Filho (-4)
21 Jon Fitch (NR)
22 Miguel Torres (NR)
23 Jake Shields (NR)
24 Hayato Sakurai
25 Sean Sherk (-4)
Hopefully the old Pancrase oddities are put to bed sooner, rather than later.
I think this is one of the strongest sets we’ve put out.
11 Urijah Faber (+1)
12 Chuck Liddell (-1)
13 Nate Marquardt
14 Quinton Jackson
15 Shinya Aoki (+5)
16 Josh Barnett (-1)
17 Lyoto Machida (+2)
18 Mauricio Rua (-1)
19 Rich Franklin (+3)
20 Paulo Filho (-4)
21 Jon Fitch (NR)
22 Miguel Torres (NR)
23 Jake Shields (NR)
24 Hayato Sakurai
25 Sean Sherk (-4)
I think I know something that will assist the issue, but will need time to test. Basically, my adjustment for the early Pancrase stuff is too strong and does not consider a few early aspects of MMA and the challenges that Pancrase brought upon it.
Nevermind, the bug was pretty simple to resolve. It did affect Kunioku considerably, but not enough to move his rank down.
I’ll keep looking. I have a feeling these non-heavyweights are being over-rewarded for the old Pancrase bouts.
I believe I did find a bug though that would improperly reward non-heavyweights in the old Pancrase days… Ahh. it will be a beast to fix though. Stay tuned.
I do appreciate the quick response, I really do. Still, their has to be a better way of integrating the early pancrase results into your ranking system. All of the really suspect rankings are due to those Pancrase fights (Schilt, Marquardt and now Kunioku).
Kiuma Kunioku burst onto the scene as the #4 Welterweight of All-Time after reclassification of some older Pancrase bouts. As (conceivably) a Welterweight, Kunioku beat much larger, notable fighters such as Guy Mezger, Frank Shamrock, Yuki Kondo, and Masakatsu Funaki.
Many of his early Pancrase bouts (as well as Marquardt’s) that were held within set divisional limits straddled the line between our Middleweight and Welterweight ranges. Just recently, I found more info that suggested they were technically Welterweight bouts (even though they were for the Middleweight KoP titles).
This seems to have placed the Pancrase credit for Kunioku to Welterweight, and I believe before he received the credit for Heavyweight (because a “real” division could not be ascertained).
To be perfectly honest, there’s no good way to handle the old Pancrase bouts for the non-Heavyweights.
If you ask me, Welterweight is a crap shoot below #3 anyway.
Kiuma Kunioku #4 all-time at welterweight? Please tell that it’s just a glitch.
I do appreciate the quick response, I really do. Still, their has to be a better way of integrating the early pancrase results into your ranking system. All of the really suspect rankings are due to those Pancrase fights (Schilt, Marquardt and now Kunioku).
Kiuma Kunioku #4 all-time at welterweight? Please tell that it’s just a glitch.
Here’s another sugestion/request: assuming that you keep past data, maybe you could add an arrow (pointing up or down) next to each fighter’s name telling us how many spots these guys have moved within the last 365 days. It’s just a thought.
Here’s another sugestion/request: assuming that you keep past data, maybe you could add an arrow (pointing up or down) next to each fighter’s name telling us how many spots these guys have moved within the last 365 days. It’s just a thought.
JCS, is there any chance that you could update the the all-time top 25 again? It’s always greatly appreciated.
The same reason that BJ Penn is ahead of Urijah Faber.
How can someone who’s 7th in one division and 5th in another division be ahead of someone who’s 1st in his division?
How can someone who’s 7th in one division and 5th in another division be ahead of someone who’s 1st in his division?
Those guys look weak historically, but were obviously much better back then, ability-wise and relative to the competition — Particularly Kiuma Kunioku.
There are several guys who get too much credit on this site for their Pancrase accomplishments- Marquardt is the most blatant example.
He wasn’t even that impressive in Pancrase(losses against Genki Sudo, Kiuma Kunioku, Izuru Takeuchi, Keiichiro Yamamiya, and Ricardo Almeida. Wins against Daiju Takase, Kiuma Kunioku, Shonie Carter, Hikaru Sato, Masaya Kojima, Yuji Hoshino, Kazuo Misaki, Seiki Ryo, Kiuma Kunioku, Izuru Takeuchi, Yuji Hisamatsu, Izuru Takeuchi. Draws against Kiuma Kunioku and Eiji Ishikawa. That’s a 12-5-2 record against very lackluster opposition. He does have a few big wins in the UFC.
Nate is currently #13. If Bas and Frank can get all that credit for Pancrase, why can’t Nate?
Essentially, Nate has been Top 10 in his division since the end of 2000. There may have been some times where he has been between 11-15, but looking back, his average rank in this time period would probably be #6. He’s also had no spells of inactivity, and less than a handful of opponents outside of the Top 50. Middleweight has been a strong division for a while now…
How many fighters can say the same thing?
I think you’ll find that Marquardt will drop soon, as more fighters will be able to say the same thing.. like a Fitch.. but Marquardt is still hanging tough and earning points.
Also, the top five guys are all known for their success in just one division. I don’t think “multi-divisional accomplishments” are given extra credit at all.
Yeah, I’ve got no problem with Henderson in the top ten. Marquardt way up there at #12 is the one that I’ll never agree with.
I think Henderson is an extremely underrated fighter. I have absolutely no issue with his placement.
I think Henderson is an extremely underrated fighter. I have absolutely no issue with his placement.
It seems like the abolute rankings may over-reward multi-divisional accomplishments. Seems very strange to me that Chuck Liddell could be behind Dan Henderson.
chuck should be in the top 10 absolute instead of hendo
chuck should be in the top 10 absolute instead of hendo
Theres no way fedor should be #1 on this list I dont care how you slice it for the last 4 or 5 years hes been doggin it only taking fights that he though he could win and losing two of em anyways against guys he should of beat he should be 3rd all time right now Silva should be fist with GSP a very close second Whoever wins the GSP SILVA fight GOD willing it happens is the greatest p4p champion in mixed martial history HANDS DOWN
Theres no way fedor should be #1 on this list I dont care how you slice it for the last 4 or 5 years hes been doggin it only taking fights that he though he could win and losing two of em anyways against guys he should of beat he should be 3rd all time right now Silva should be fist with GSP a very close second Whoever wins the GSP SILVA fight GOD willing it happens is the greatest p4p champion in mixed martial history HANDS DOWN
It’s about time I saw some realistic rankings p4p wise. Good work guys, finally another MMA site that keeps it real.
Fighters can move down as a result of losses, data changes, certain metrics, etc. However, its going to mostly be an upward trend. We just released a metric update, which saw some changes. The algorithm also has a data segmentation component, as well as falling back on the database itself for some parameters…. not to mention code changes.
Can a fighter move down the Absolute list by losing matches, or can he only be overtaken? One could interpret “sum of the fighters’ accomplishments” to mean that this particular list only takes into account positive achievements.
How far off, in terms of points, are the number 2 all time fighters on the absolute and heavyweight lists from overtaking Fedor?
Can a fighter move down the Absolute list by losing matches, or can he only be overtaken? One could interpret “sum of the fighters’ accomplishments” to mean that this particular list only takes into account positive achievements.
How far off, in terms of points, are the number 2 all time fighters on the absolute and heavyweight lists from overtaking Fedor?
It looks like my prediction for the lightweight division is already in trouble, now that Florian is dropping down in weight.
As for the absolute ranking, there is definitely room for improvement there as far as balancing divisional strength and accomplishments throughout the years.. again, the problem is that we only have actual ranking data for 3 years (and MMA history goes back much further) — then you have the issue that finding the divisional data for anything non-Heavyweight, older than 5 years is nearly impossible to find, aside from major organizations..
It looks like my prediction for the lightweight division is already in trouble, now that Florian is dropping down in weight.
As for the absolute ranking, there is definitely room for improvement there as far as balancing divisional strength and accomplishments throughout the years.. again, the problem is that we only have actual ranking data for 3 years (and MMA history goes back much further) — then you have the issue that finding the divisional data for anything non-Heavyweight, older than 5 years is nearly impossible to find, aside from major organizations..
That’s about what I expected. Thanks for the info.
Hard to say. If Fedor totally sucks from here on out, and GSP/Anderson keep doing what they’re doing.. I’d say 18-24 months for Anderson, 3 years for GSP. Total guess though.
A guy who has a potential to start moving rapidly is Penn. If he can knock off Fitch and another decent WW fighter, he probably gets into Top 10 WW right then.
I’m curious… Assuming Fedor doesn’t win the upcoming Strikeforce tournament and Silva and/or GSP can continue to string some wins together, how long before they displace Fedor as #1?
That’s about what I expected. Thanks for the info.
Hard to say. If Fedor totally sucks from here on out, and GSP/Anderson keep doing what they’re doing.. I’d say 18-24 months for Anderson, 3 years for GSP. Total guess though.
A guy who has a potential to start moving rapidly is Penn. If he can knock off Fitch and another decent WW fighter, he probably gets into Top 10 WW right then.
I’m curious… Assuming Fedor doesn’t win the upcoming Strikeforce tournament and Silva and/or GSP can continue to string some wins together, how long before they displace Fedor as #1?
I understand that Marquardt high ranking on the all-time lists is largely based on his pacrase accomplishments. Personally, I think Marquardt (as well as Rutten and Schilt) are given way to much credit for their pancrase fights.
In Marquardt’s case, he went 14-5-2 in Pancrase, with losses against Sudo, Kunioku, Takeuchi, Yamamiya and Almeida. His biggest Pancrase wins were over Shoney Carter, Kunioku and Misaki. He does have some good wins in the UFC, but overall, I don’t consider him to be among the top 50 most acclomplished MMA fighters of all-time.
Marquardt accomplished quite a bit in Pancrase before signing with the UFC. He does seem to be the permanent #2 contender now, though.
I understand that Marquardt high ranking on the all-time lists is largely based on his pacrase accomplishments. Personally, I think Marquardt (as well as Rutten and Schilt) are given way to much credit for their pancrase fights.
In Marquardt’s case, he went 14-5-2 in Pancrase, with losses against Sudo, Kunioku, Takeuchi, Yamamiya and Almeida. His biggest Pancrase wins were over Shoney Carter, Kunioku and Misaki. He does have some good wins in the UFC, but overall, I don’t consider him to be among the top 50 most acclomplished MMA fighters of all-time.
Marquardt accomplished quite a bit in Pancrase before signing with the UFC. He does seem to be the permanent #2 contender now, though.
Nate Marquardt at #13 is the one that shocks me the most.
#25 sounds like a decent spot then.
Ribeiro rode near the top of the division for quite a while.. and to do so, he had to get some good wins. I will however, look at the code.. as I had planned an optimization anyhow..
I’m fascinated by the idea that Vitor Ribeiro is the 25th most accomplished fighter in modern MMA history. I don’t mean that in a negative way. Most people, if asked to name their own top 25, would almost certainly not name Vitor Ribeiro. The rest of the top 25 is much less surprising to me.
I’m fascinated by the idea that Vitor Ribeiro is the 25th most accomplished fighter in modern MMA history. I don’t mean that in a negative way. Most people, if asked to name their own top 25, would almost certainly not name Vitor Ribeiro. The rest of the top 25 is much less surprising to me.
yes
Thanks! That’s from the Absolute list, correct?
Change from last time included
11 Chuck Liddell (-1)
12 Urijah Faber
13 Nate Marquardt
14 Quinton Jackson (+2)
15 Josh Barnett (-1)
16 Paulo Filho (+1)
17 Mauricio Rua (+1)
18 Tito Ortiz (-3)
19 Lyoto Machida (+1)
20 Shinya Aoki (+2)
21 Sean Sherk (-2)
22 Rich Franklin (+1)
23 Mirko Filipovic (-2)
24 Hayato Sakurai (+1)
25 Vitor Ribeiro (-1)
yes
I would really really like to see a top 20 for the all-time rankings. The number of fighters involved is so much greater than with the “Current” rankings. A top 10 doesn’t seem to tell the full story.
Thanks! That’s from the Absolute list, correct?
Change from last time included
11 Chuck Liddell (-1)
12 Urijah Faber
13 Nate Marquardt
14 Quinton Jackson (+2)
15 Josh Barnett (-1)
16 Paulo Filho (+1)
17 Mauricio Rua (+1)
18 Tito Ortiz (-3)
19 Lyoto Machida (+1)
20 Shinya Aoki (+2)
21 Sean Sherk (-2)
22 Rich Franklin (+1)
23 Mirko Filipovic (-2)
24 Hayato Sakurai (+1)
25 Vitor Ribeiro (-1)
Edgar/Florian are a little ahead of Maynard, although obviously Florian is stalling a bit. I don’t think Maynard makes it in by the end of this year. Who knows? We have your prediction on record.
I predict that Florian, Edgar and Maynard will each be in the all-time lightweight top ten by the end of the year.
I predict that Florian, Edgar and Maynard will each be in the all-time lightweight top ten by the end of the year.
Yeah.. the list is really built for fighters once they have ended their careers. There are some longevity/volume checks that will kick in during an active fighter’s career, causing a bit of acceleration.
Yeah.. the list is really built for fighters once they have ended their careers. There are some longevity/volume checks that will kick in during an active fighter’s career, causing a bit of acceleration.
Wow… Dominick Cruz wasn’t even in the top ten on the bantamweight all-time list a few months ago and now he’s #3.
Not that I’m complaining.
Bug fixed. Rampage up to #14, Ortiz down to #17. Rest of list is unchanged.
There’s actually a bug I just found in the absolute calculation… Have to fix that.
I’m really surprised that Fitch isn’t in the top 25 on the absolute list.
Much appreciated, thank you.
11 Henderson
12 Faber
13 Marquardt
14 Barnett
15 Ortiz
16 Rampage
17 Filho
18 Shogun
19 Sherk
20 Machida
21 CroCop
22 Aoki
23 Franklin
24 Ribeiro
25 Sakurai
Any chance that you could give us the #11 thru #20 fighters for the updated career absolute list? I know it’s a lot to ask…
She’s probably in for good at this point.
Well, Santos is back up to #8…I wonder if she’ll still be in the top ten when the next revision is done. LOL
Any chance that you could give us the #11 thru #20 fighters for the updated career absolute list? I know it’s a lot to ask…
She’s probably in for good at this point.
Well, Santos is back up to #8…I wonder if she’ll still be in the top ten when the next revision is done. LOL
Nate Marquardt greatest A. Silva , Ch. Sonnen , Y. Okami and all fighters in middleweight division .
Fluctuations.. changes in data. Bound to happen as frequently as we update past records. Positions are real tight, so I’m guessing she’ll stay in the list after another few months, barring a total decline.
I’m curious… why was Chris Santos removed from the women’s open all-time list?
I’m guessing that Gilbert Melendez, Frankie Edgar and possibly Gray Maynard could all reach the top ten within the next year.
Sometimes the rankings don’t make sense if a guy is just getting into his prime. By nature, its part longevity-based, part accomplishment-based. In other words, Edgar could be late to the party since he just hit the big time.
I’m doing an update this week. Not sure he gets on, but if he stays near the top it shouldn’t be too long until he does.
How is Florian in the LW top 10, but not Edgar? You’d think the 2 wins over BJ would be way bigger points-wise than anything Kenny has done.
Fluctuations.. changes in data. Bound to happen as frequently as we update past records. Positions are real tight, so I’m guessing she’ll stay in the list after another few months, barring a total decline.
I’m curious… why was Chris Santos removed from the women’s open all-time list?
I’m guessing that Gilbert Melendez, Frankie Edgar and possibly Gray Maynard could all reach the top ten within the next year.
How is Florian in the LW top 10, but not Edgar? You’d think the 2 wins over BJ would be way bigger points-wise than anything Kenny has done.
See the word, “Peak”? The reason you stated is why he’s #1 Absolute and #1 Heavyweight.
See the word, “Peak”? The reason you stated is why he’s #1 Absolute and #1 Heavyweight.
Fedor being #1 in his division for 7 years
how is not that the best division dominance?
I just noticed that four of the five japanese fighters on the bantamweight list are either retired or should be. Meanwhile, the five americans on the list are still doing fairly well. As there are other american fighters also doing very well (mostly in the WEC), it seems that the americans are poised to dominate the bantamweight list over the next couple of years.
I just noticed that four of the five japanese fighters on the bantamweight list are either retired or should be. Meanwhile, the five americans on the list are still doing fairly well. As there are other american fighters also doing very well (mostly in the WEC),
I just noticed that four of the five japanese fighters on the bantamweight list are either retired or should be. Meanwhile, the five americans on the list are still doing fairly well. As there are other american fighters also doing very well (mostly in the WEC),
Nice to see Cristiane Santos on the women’s list- she deserves it.
Nice to see Cristiane Santos on the women’s list- she deserves it.
Tanner was 5-4 at Middleweight and had no major accomplishments at Light Heavyweight.
Or even light heavyweight? He deserves to be ranked somewhere.
Where’s Evan Tanner at middleweight?
Or even light heavyweight? He deserves to be ranked somewhere.
Where’s Evan Tanner at middleweight?
It’s nice to see Florian on the 155lb. list- he’s had a lot of good wins.
It’s nice to see Florian on the 155lb. list- he’s had a lot of good wins.
Remember that Sonnen spent 2/3rds of his career at 205. He’ll likely need another two good years to have a chance at cracking the top 10.
chael sonnen definatley deserves to be on middleweight after this year.
chael sonnen definatley deserves to be on middleweight after this year.
Lindland/Henderson are neck and neck. We discovered we had some early Hendo matches at the wrong division. He will move ahead of Lindland on next update, probably permanently.
Schilt is #8 at HW because he was at (or near) the top during his early days in Pancrase. The heavyweight/openweight quality there was a lot higher than what the average American fan thinks/realizes.
Evan Tanner had a grand total (that we know of) of 9 Middleweight fights. He was 5-4.
Also , how the hell is Almeida on the MW list when Evan Tanner isn’t? , Ridiculous
Why is Lindland ahead of Henderson , and how the hell is Schilt number 8 at HW?
These rankings are a mixture time-based and raw accomplishment-based due to them being a career ranking.
You don’t want to award a “flash in the pan” too heavily, nor do you want to award a longtime fringe contender a top 10 spot.
Edgar’s career is pretty young and as such, he’s behind guys like Florian and Melendez, but obviously he’s ascending at a faster rate than those guys.
Pulver on the other hand has some important wins early in the “pioneer” 155 days. He also held alofty ranking for extended periods. A lot of the wins don’t look good on name value, but even wins like Dennis Hallman and Phil Johns (at the time) were very good wins.
I was actually surprised to see that Pulver wasn’t higher than tenth. Still, his career is pretty much over- Florian and Edgar will probably pass him by this time next year.
Jens Pulver has had a lot of his wins at 145. His only real major 155 wins were BJ Penn, Uno, and Joe Stevenson.
Frankie Edgar beat Penn twice, has only one less win at LW than Pulver, has only one loss at LW to Pulvers 8, and has had a much tougher set of opponents. How has he not made it past Pulver on the all-time list?
I was actually surprised to see that Pulver wasn’t higher than tenth. Still, his career is pretty much over- Florian and Edgar will probably pass him by this time next year.
Jens Pulver has had a lot of his wins at 145. His only real major 155 wins were BJ Penn, Uno, and Joe Stevenson.
Frankie Edgar beat Penn twice, has only one less win at LW than Pulver, has only one loss at LW to Pulvers 8, and has had a much tougher set of opponents. How has he not made it past Pulver on the all-time list?
[…] […]
And just for fun… based on trends, if these fighters keep it up for a few more years (some less), they’ve got a shot at being ranked:
Heavyweight: Brock Lesnar
Light Heavyweight: Rashad Evans, Forrest Griffin
Middleweight: Jorge Santiago
Welterweight: Jake Shields, Nick Diaz
Lightweight: Kenny Florian, Gilbert Melendez, Frankie Edgar
Featherweight: Marlon Sandro
Bantamweight: Dominick Cruz (very soon)
Womens: Cristiane Santos
Thank You.
12. Urijah Faber
13. Tito Ortiz
14. Nate Marquardt
15. Josh Barnett
16. Quinton Jackson
17. Paulo Filho
18. Mirko Filipovic
19. Rich Franklin
20. Sean Sherk
Thanks for the extra info (even if I was hoping for a bit more than that).
And just for fun… based on trends, if these fighters keep it up for a few more years (some less), they’ve got a shot at being ranked:
Heavyweight: Brock Lesnar
Light Heavyweight: Rashad Evans, Forrest Griffin
Middleweight: Jorge Santiago
Welterweight: Jake Shields, Nick Diaz
Lightweight: Kenny Florian, Gilbert Melendez, Frankie Edgar
Featherweight: Marlon Sandro
Bantamweight: Dominick Cruz (very soon)
Womens: Cristiane Santos
[…] All-Time MMA Rankings […]
I can tell you that Dan Henderson is #11 =)
12. Urijah Faber
13. Tito Ortiz
14. Nate Marquardt
15. Josh Barnett
16. Quinton Jackson
17. Paulo Filho
18. Mirko Filipovic
19. Rich Franklin
20. Sean Sherk
Thanks for the extra info (even if I was hoping for a bit more than that).
Could you at least list #11 thru 20 on the career absolute list? It would be greatly appreciated. You could list it right here.
Could you at least list #11 thru 20 on the career absolute list? It would be greatly appreciated. You could list it right here.
Hey now.. its a prestigious thing to get into the Top 10 :).
Seriously, when you leave the Top 10, in most divisions, guys are very close together. Add fluctuations in, and you’ve got people moving up and down constantly. Really, these rankings will only solidify after guys retire and if we ever finalize data.
In other words, I’d like to keep it at 10 for now.
These lists are a great idea, but I do wish that you’d consider expanding them to the 25 or even 50 fighters.
[…] All-Time MMA Rankings […]
Igor is #15 Heavyweight currently. Sakuraba spent too much time shifting around weight classes to be in any Top 25. Frank is #9 at Light Heavy as you’ll notice above. Severn and Royce are bottom of Top 20, we rate on accomplishment, not pioneer status or name value. Rickson is somewhere around #50 Heavyweight/Open
where are royce and rickson gracie, sakuraba, franck shamrock, dan severn and igor??????
Igor is #13 at last check.
Why isn’t Igor on here? Yes at the end of his career he had losses but he went on a like a 32 unbeaten streak
[…] […]
[…] All-Time MMA Rankings […]
Franca’s 3 of his last 5 were at Lightweight. He was a top Featherweight for years, winning/defending the Shooto 143 belt many times. At this point, he’s past his prime.
These rankings are more concerned about what the fighter did, then about what they didn’t do. His last two losses are also on the Top 10 Featherweight All-Time list.
It’s questionable that someone like Alexandre Franca Nogueira could be on a list at number 2 having dropped his last two fights. Can anyone tell us what factors are considered when putting these lists together. It seems to me that using only empirical data to populate the lists makes for questionable rankings
Peak division dominance is coming soon. Most of the names you’d expect, along with a couple from the early days.
Peak division dominance is coming soon. Most of the names you’d expect, along with a couple from the early days.
Great idea! it would be cool if you gave a more detailed explanation as to how these rankings are calculated. You should also consider making a peak dominance ranking if that is possible
[…] All-Time MMA Rankings […]