| Saturday, July 18th 2026: Professional Fighters League PFL Austin: Van Steenis vs. Eblen 2 | |||
|
| |||
| Last Fight Date: 3/20/2026 [PFL] Last Opponent: [#16 MW] Fabian Edwards Last 5: L W W W W | Last Fight Date: 3/28/2026 [PFL] Last Opponent: [#50 MW] Bryan Battle Last 5: W W W L W | ||
| Saturday, June 27th 2026: Professional Fighters League PFL San Diego: McKee vs. Isbulaev | |||
|
| |||
| Last Fight Date: 8/15/2025 [PFL] Last Opponent: [#16 W125] Jena Bishop Last 5: W L W W W | Last Fight Date: 4/11/2026 [PFL] Last Opponent: [#60 W125] Shanna Young Last 5: W L W L W | ||
| Sunday, May 31st 2026: Shooto Professional Shooto 2026 Vol. 4 | |||
|
| |||
| Last Fight Date: 11/16/2025 [Shooto] Last Opponent: [#243 FLW] Jo Arai Last 5: W W W W L | Last Fight Date: 1/18/2026 [Shooto] Last Opponent: [#38 SW] Ken Asahina Last 5: W W W W W | ||

| [#204 LW] | Rustambek Nurzhanov |   | [#2 MW] | Khamzat Chimaev |
| [#1 MW] | Sean Strickland |   | [#861 LW] | Daniel Holt |
| [NR] | Shavkat Rakhmonov |   | [#4 FLW] | Tatsuro Taira |
| [#13 WW] | Yaroslav Amosov |   | [#1 LW] | Ilia Topuria |
| [#1 FLW] | Joshua Van |   | [#1 WW] | Islam Makhachev |

Heavyweight Championship (265)
[#1/#2DD] Junior dos Santos (15-1-0, 239.0lb) vs. [#2/#8DD] Cain Velasquez (10-1-0, 240.0lb)
Junior dos Santos is the All-Time #5 ranked Heavyweight fighter.
Cain Velasquez is the All-Time #7 ranked Heavyweight fighter.
Last 3 Fights: Junior dos Santos (3-0-0)
2012-05-26: W vs. [#6HW+] Frank Mir (16-6-0) via TKO (Punches) in 3:04 of round 2
2011-11-12: W vs. [#2HW+/#8DD] Cain Velasquez (10-1-0) via KO (Punches) in 1:04 of round 1
2011-06-11: W vs. [*] Shane Carwin (12-2-0) via UD (30-27, 30-27, 30-26)
Last 3 Fights: Cain Velasquez (2-1-0)
2012-05-26: W vs. [#7HW+] Antonio Silva (17-4-0) via TKO (Punches) in 3:36 of round 1
2011-11-12: L vs. [#1HW+/#2DD] Junior dos Santos (15-1-0) via KO (Punches) in 1:04 of round 1
2010-10-23: W vs. [*] Brock Lesnar (5-3-0) via TKO (Punches) in 4:12 of round 1
Days Since Last Pro Fight: Junior dos Santos 217, Cain Velasquez 217
Previous Match-up Record: Junior dos Santos leads 1-0-0
Wins Against Common Opposition: No common opposition or both are winless against common opposition.
.
Lightweight (155)
[#17] Jim Miller (21-4-0, 156.0lb) vs. [#18] Joe Lauzon (22-7-0, 156.0lb)
Jim Miller is the All-Time #22 ranked Lightweight fighter.
Last 3 Fights: Jim Miller (1-2-0)
2012-05-05: L vs. [#5LW] Nate Diaz (16-8-0) via Submission (Guillotine Choke) in 4:09 of round 2
2012-01-20: W vs. [#32LW] Melvin Guillard (30-12-2) via Submission (Rear Naked Choke) in 3:04 of round 1
2011-08-14: L vs. [#1LW/#5DD] Ben Henderson (18-2-0) via UD (30-27, 30-26, 29-28)
Last 3 Fights: Joe Lauzon (2-1-0)
2012-08-04: W vs. [#52LW] Jamie Varner (20-7-1) via Submission (Triangle Choke) in 2:44 of round 3
2012-02-26: L vs. [#12LW] Anthony Pettis (15-2-0) via KO (Head Kick and Punches) in 1:21 of round 1
2011-10-08: W vs. [#32LW] Melvin Guillard (30-12-2) via Submission (Rear Naked Choke) in 0:47 of round 1
Days Since Last Pro Fight: Jim Miller 238, Joe Lauzon 147
Previous Match-up Record: No previous match-ups.
Wins Against Common Opposition: Even: Both have 1 win(s) against common opposition.
.
Middleweight (185)
[#6] Tim Boetsch (16-4-0, 186.0lb) vs. [#22] Constantinos Philippou (11-2-0, 186.0lb)
Last 3 Fights: Tim Boetsch (3-0-0)
2012-07-21: W vs. [#7MW] Hector Lombard (32-3-1) via SD (29-28, 28-29, 29-28)
2012-02-26: W vs. [#16MW] Yushin Okami (27-7-0) via TKO (Punches) in 0:54 of round 3
2011-09-24: W vs. [#35MW] Nick Ring (13-1-0) via UD (30-27, 29-28, 29-28)
Last 3 Fights: Constantinos Philippou (3-0-0)
2012-07-07: W vs. [#52MW] Riki Fukuda (19-6-0) via UD (30-27, 30-27, 29-28)
2012-03-03: W vs. [#68MW] Court McGee (14-3-0) via UD (29-28, 29-28, 29-28)
2011-12-10: W vs. [#123MW] Jared Hamman (13-5-0) via KO (Punches) in 3:11 of round 1
Days Since Last Pro Fight: Tim Boetsch 161, Constantinos Philippou 175
Previous Match-up Record: No previous match-ups.
Wins Against Common Opposition: Even: Both have 1 win(s) against common opposition.
.
Keep Reading

This is not an attempt to suggest the rating system is more accurate than gambling odds. Gamblers can analyze each fight individually, while the rating system uses a variety of mathematical routines to supply a primary fighter rating that is focused on ranking recent achievement, with a secondary priority of gauging future expectation.
With that said, there are some caveats to using the rating vs. odds comparison straight-up — the “Gotcha” list:
But this stuff (especially #5) is pretty much common sense. We try to partially factor in #1-#3 when we compute the ratings, but #5 and #6 is something that the human can factor in, that the system can’t. For the sake of these articles, we’ll attempt to factor in #4 when relevant. Home advantage can have a slight effect, but likely not enough to sway the “I’d bet on” decision.
Experienced gamblers know that it’s not about being right the most, it’s about making the most money. So in the usual table, I’ll add the “I’d bet on” column and analyze the rating/odds gap plus points #1-4 that I listed above. I’ll leave #5 and #6 to the fully subjective analyses (except for when Leonard Garcia is involved for #6) — of which I’m sure there will be plenty.
The gotchas aren’t necessarily comprehensive, but I have noted them as I come across them and when they are considered in the decision.
Having said all that, let’s get started:
Ratings vs. Odds
| Fight | Odds Favorite | Rating Favorite | I’d bet on | “Gotchas” |
| Holloway vs. Garcia | Holloway (-342 / Large) | Holloway (1.58x / Moderate) | PASS | #6 |
| Moraga vs. Cariaso | Moraga (-177 / Small) | Cariaso (1.47x / Moderate) | Cariaso | |
| Duffee vs. De Fries | Duffee (-287 / Moderate) | Duffee (1.30x / Small) | De Fries | |
| Johnson vs. Jury | Johnson (-232 / Moderate) | Johnson (3.16x / Very Large) | PASS | #3 |
| Guillard vs. Varner | Guillard (-129 / Very Small) | Guillard (1.30x / Small) | Guillard | |
| Perez vs. Bloodworth | Perez (-416 / Large) | Perez (3.84x / Massive) | Perez | |
| Pickett vs. Wineland | Wineland (-114 / Pick ‘Em) | Wineland (1.09x / Pick ‘Em) | PASS | |
| Leben vs. Brunson | Leben (-150 / Small) | Leben (1.62x / Moderate) | PASS | #2 |
| Okami vs. Belcher | Okami (-116 / Pick ‘Em) | Belcher (1.39x / Small) | Belcher | |
| Boetsch vs. Philippou | Philippou (-115 / Pick ‘Em) | Boetsch (1.83x / Large) | Boetsch | |
| Miller vs. Lauzon | Miller (-219 / Moderate) | EVEN | Lauzon | |
| dos Santos vs. Velasquez | dos Santos (-203 / Moderate) | dos Santos (1.56x / Moderate) | PASS |
Now, to the results — given the odds above:
The PASS suggests that the odds and ratings difference are nearly identical and/or there are too many gotchas, so neither fighter is a good bet.
There are two favorites worth backing: Guillard and Perez. Guillard is worth a very small bet, while Perez looks like good parlay material. He’s got a tremendous rating advantage over his opponent.
This leaves FIVE underdogs worth considering:
De Fries vs. Duffee – This one is worth a very small flier at best. Duffee is the ratings favorite, but the rating difference suggests Duffee projects to approximately a -160 favorite, not a -300 one.
Lauzon vs. Miller – A “dead even” fight by FightMatrix standards, so it’s worth taking a chance on Lauzon who is about a 2-to-1 underdog right now.
Belcher vs. Okami – Okami is a guy that the system has always shown a relative dislike for. Take that with a grain of salt and pass, or ride with Belcher for a moderate bet, even if he becomes a very slight favorite.
Cariaso vs. Moraga – Cariaso recently dropped from Bantam and took his points with him. If the weight comes off easily, he makes a fairly strong underdog bet.
Boetsch vs. Philippou – Though helped just a bit by his questionable decision win over Lombard, he looks to be the most solid underdog bet of the bunch.

We feature two upsets per year, the most “noteworthy” and the most “lopsided”.
The most “noteworthy” upset is based on a net difference of pre-fight rating points, normalized by division.
This was not a big year for notable upsets, but the most noteworthy based on our standards was: Josh Sampo UD(3) Antonio Banuelos. For this win Sampo also earns the “most improved” award.
The most “lopsided” upset is based on the largest divisible difference between pre-fight rating points.
The upset that makes the notability cut is Ilir Latifi UD(3) Tony Lopez.
In the world of obscurity, quite possibility the biggest upset in history took place — assuming the previous records are correct (a main reason we have a notability requirement). On 9/8, a previously 0-3 fighter named Ben Santiago TKO’d Paulo Goncalves Silva, who was ranked and held a previous record of 18-7.

It should come as no surprise that Ronda Rousey, now holder of the only Women’s MMA championship that really matters, is our Women’s 2012 Fighter of the Year. With two first round finishes against the best competition available, you could not have given the award to anyone else.
The first runner-up is Ayaka Hamasaki who went 3-0 on the year against quality ranked opposition, including a dominant win over Yuka Tsuji, one of the best women’s fighters in history. Hamasaki is undoubtedly the best women’s fighter in Asia and with a record of 9-0, she’s beaten the best over there (sans Fujii) in her division. With the 115lb division relatively unestablished in the USA, let’s hope it picks up and she fights Aguilar before exiting her prime.
In third place is Jessica Penne who put the Atomweight division on the map by beating the consensus #1 and our 2011 Women’s Fighter of the Year, the previously undefeated Naho Sugiyama.
The honorable mention goes to Jessica Aguilar. Her questionable win over the aged Megumi Fujii to propel her to the top of the division did not go unnoticed, but aside from that, her year was relatively quiet.
We added another feature to our new Octagon Time page: longest & shortest average UFC fight time (minimum of 5 UFC bouts required).
Holding the record for the shortest average fight time is the UFC 1 veteran Pat Smith, who achieve a 4-2 record in the promotion while averaging a little over a minute per fight. On the other end of the spectrum is the current lightweight champion Benson Henderson. At a perfect 6-0 in UFC, all of his fights in the Octagon went the distance. Between three 3-rounders and three 5-rounders, this averages out to a hefty 20 minutes per fight.
Thanks to the Underground forum member ‘Narcolepsy’ for the suggestion!
Amassing a 5-0 record in 2012, finishing all opponents in the first round, 74th ranked Heavyweight, Smealinho Rama is our Men’s Rookie of the Year
As you may already know, during his UFC on Fox fight against Rory MacDonald, former lightweight and welterweight UFC champion BJ Penn surpassed Tito Ortiz’s record for the most total fight time in the UFC Octagon.
We decided to put together a Top 25 of UFC fighters with most Octagon time clocked in over the course of their career. Of course, BJ Penn and Tito Ortiz sit atop of the list with over 5 hours of fight time. Beneath them, the only 2 fighters with 4+ hours of UFC fight time are Randy Couture and Georges St. Pierre.
With Ortiz and Couture retired and BJ Penn clearly near the end of his career, GSP is poised to overtake the Top 3 and to set a new record within 2 fights. In fact, if his next fight goes the full 5 rounds as has been the trend in all his recent fights, he will surpass Ortiz and be only 39 seconds behind Penn’s record. Even if BJ continues fighting, he is very unlikely to stave off St. Pierre, as Penn will not be fighting any 5-rounders.
See the full Top 25 here: Most Octagon Time
This will be a permanent feature in our UFC Records section.
Amassing a record of 4-0 in the 2012 calendar year, (#9 W115) Joanne Calderwood is our 2012 Female Rookie of the Year
We’re starting to release our yearly awards and there’s not really much to add to this subject line. You have to give it to GSP for coming back from a torn ACL to dominantly defending his Welterweight Championship.
This is not an attempt to suggest the rating system is more accurate than gambling odds. Gamblers can analyze each fight individually, while the rating system uses a variety of mathematical routines to supply a primary fighter rating that is focused on ranking recent achievement, with a secondary priority of gauging future expectation.
With that said, there are some caveats to using the rating vs. odds comparison straight-up — the “Gotcha” list:
But this stuff (especially #5) is pretty much common sense. We try to partially factor in #1-#3 when we compute the ratings, but #5 and #6 is something that the human can factor in, that the system can’t. For the sake of these articles, we’ll attempt to factor in #4 when relevant. Home advantage can have a slight effect, but likely not enough to sway the “I’d bet on” decision.
Experienced gamblers know that it’s not about being right the most, it’s about making the most money. So in the usual table, I’ll add the “I’d bet on” column and analyze the rating/odds gap plus points #1-4 that I listed above. I’ll leave #5 and #6 to the fully subjective analyses — of which I’m sure there will be plenty.
The gotchas aren’t necessarily comprehensive, but I have noted them as I come across them and when they are considered in the decision.
Having said all that, let’s get started:
Ratings vs. Odds
| Fight | Odds Favorite | Rating Favorite | I’d bet on | “Gotchas” |
| Elliott vs. Papazian | Elliott (-158 / Small) | Papazian (1.09x / Pick ‘Em) | PASS | #1 |
| Cofer vs. Rio | Rio (-162 / Small) | Rio (1.12x / Pick ‘Em) | Cofer | |
| Duran vs. Viana | Duran (-125 / Very Small) | Viana (1.53x / Moderate) | PASS | #1, #3 |
| Waldburger vs. Catone | Waldburger (-133 / Very Small) | Waldburger (2.16x / Large) | Waldburger | #1 |
| Khabilov vs. Pichel | Khabilov (-246 / Moderate) | Khabilov (1.95x / Large) | PASS | #3, #4 |
| Vinicius vs. Bedford | Bedford (-228 / Moderate) | Bedford (1.17x / Pick ‘Em) | PASS | #1, #3 |
| Pyle vs. Head | Pyle (-217 / Moderate) | Pyle (1.08x / Pick ‘Em) | Head | |
| Poirier vs. Brookins | Poirier (-258 / Moderate) | Poirier (1.58x / Moderate) | PASS | |
| Guillard vs. Varner | Guillard (-124 / Pick ‘Em) | Guillard (1.32x / Small) | PASS | |
| Barry vs. del Rosario | del Rosario (-226 / Moderate) | Barry (1.24x / Very Small) | Barry | |
| Nelson vs. Mitrione | Nelson (-254 / Moderate) | Nelson (1.76x / Moderate) | PASS |
Now, to the results — given the odds above:
The PASS suggests that the odds and ratings difference are nearly identical, so neither fighter is a good bet or there are too many gotchas.
There is just one favorite worth backing:
The Waldburger bet is marked because the ratings difference agrees with the odds, but to a larger degree. The odds appear way off on this one, unless Catone is a completely different fighter at the new weight.
This leaves three underdogs worth considering:
Cofer vs. Rio – Definitely the weakest play of the three. If Rio drops below -155 or so, this one becomes a PASS. Very small play here.
Head vs. Pyle – The system loves Head for his split over Ebersole and while Pyle is justifiably the favorite, at -217, he seems to be too strong of a favorite.
Barry vs. del Rosario – The strongest of the three underdogs worth a play.
Given the relatively positive overall outcome of the last article, we’re going to give this another go, while leaning a bit more toward the “PASS” as well as when handing out the “Gotcha” flags.
Either way, this is not an attempt to suggest the rating system is more accurate than gambling odds. Gamblers can analyze each fight individually, while the rating system uses a variety of mathematical routines to supply a primary fighter rating that is focused on ranking recent achievement, with a secondary priority of gauging future expectation.
With that said, there are some caveats to using the rating vs. odds comparison straight-up — the “Gotcha” list:
But this stuff (especially #5) is pretty much common sense. We try to partially factor in #1-#3 when we compute the ratings, but #5 and #6 is something that the human can factor in, that the system can’t. For the sake of these articles, we’ll attempt to factor in #4 when relevant. Home advantage can have a slight effect, but likely not enough to sway the “I’d bet on” decision.
Experienced gamblers know that it’s not about being right the most, it’s about making the most money. So in the usual table, I’ll add the “I’d bet on” column and analyze the rating/odds gap plus points #1-4 that I listed above. I’ll leave #5 and #6 to the fully subjective analyses — of which I’m sure there will be plenty.
Having said all that, let’s get started:
Ratings vs. Odds
| Fight | Odds Favorite | Rating Favorite | I’d bet on | “Gotchas” |
| Sotiropoulos vs. Pearson | Pearson (-119 / Pick ‘Em) | Sotiropoulos (1.01x / Pick ‘Em) | PASS | #1,2,4 |
| Lombard vs. Palhares | Lombard (-208 / Moderate) | Lombard (1.75x / Moderate) | Lombard | #4 |
| Whitaker vs. Scott | Whitaker (-206 / Moderate) | Whitaker (1.28x / Small) | PASS | #4 |
| Fletcher vs. Parke | Fletcher (-121 / Pick ‘Em) | Parke (1.18x / Very Small) | Parke | |
| Mendes vs. Meza | Mendes (-1487 / Massive) | Mendes (5.21x / Massive) | PASS | |
| Pokrajac vs. Beltran | Pokrajac (-343 / Large) | Pokrajac (1.22x / Very Small) | Beltran | #1 |
| Pierce vs. Baczynski | Pierce (-348 / Large) | Pierce (2.15x / Large) | Pierce | |
| Alloway vs. Rodriguez | Alloway (-189 / Moderate) | Alloway (1.55x / Moderate) | PASS | |
| Wilkinson vs. Loughnane | Wilkinson (-205 / Moderate) | Wilkinson (1.81x / Moderate) | PASS | #2 |
| Penner vs. Donovan | Penner (-129 / Very Small) | Penner (1.10x / Pick ‘Em) | PASS | #1 |
One thing to note with this event, is that I have observed some very large shifts in odds, notably in Pierce/Baczynski, Lombard/Palhares and Alloway/Rodriguez. The odds presented are as of post time and the “I’d Bet On” column reflects that.
Now, to the results — given the odds above:
The PASS suggests that the odds and ratings difference are nearly identical, so neither fighter is a good bet or there are too many gotchas.
There are two favorites worth backing:
The Lombard and Pierce bets are marked because the ratings difference agrees with the odds, but to a larger degree. Lombard is becoming a weaker favorite (good), but Pierce is becoming a stronger favorite (bad).
If Pierce goes beyond -350, this becomes a PASS. As for Mendes/Meza, that seems like an obvious bet for Mendes, but I never advocate betting on an MMA fight with odds much wider than -1000. The statistics just don’t support it.
NOTE: Prior to this update, we had Alloway as a favorite to support at about -150. As he approached -200 (and above for a period) I had to go with a PASS.
This leaves two underdogs worth considering:
Parke vs. Fletcher: This is a tight one, so tread carefully – with a very small bet.
Beltran vs. Pokrajac: There are still questions about Beltran’s viability at 205, but with such a large gap between the odds and rating difference, Beltran is worth a small-to-medium play.