Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1026 | -34 |
|
19
|
| 1027 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1028 | -42 |
|
19
|
| 1029 | -31 |
|
19
|
| 1030 | -34 |
|
19
|
| 1031 | -30 |
|
19
|
| 1032 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1033 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1034 | -31 |
|
19
|
| 1035 | -46 |
|
19
|
| 1036 | NR |
|
19
|
| 1037 | NR |
|
19
|
| 1038 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1039 | -35 |
|
19
|
| 1040 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1041 | -32 |
|
19
|
| 1042 | -36 |
|
19
|
| 1043 | -65 |
|
19
|
| 1044 | -33 |
|
19
|
| 1045 | NR |
|
19
|
| 1046 | NR |
|
19
|
| 1047 | -202 |
|
19
|
| 1048 | -35 |
|
19
|
| 1049 | -37 |
|
19
|
| 1050 | -36 |
|
19
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice
Thanks for the heads up!