Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1376 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1377 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1378 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1379 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1380 | -20 |
|
16
|
| 1381 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1382 | -17 |
|
16
|
| 1383 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1384 | -17 |
|
16
|
| 1385 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1386 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1387 | -16 |
|
16
|
| 1388 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1389 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1390 | NR |
|
16
|
| 1391 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1392 | -15 |
|
16
|
| 1393 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1394 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1395 | -14 |
|
16
|
| 1396 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1397 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1398 | -26 |
|
16
|
| 1399 | -14 |
|
16
|
| 1400 | -12 |
|
16
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice