Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1326 | -10 |
|
16
|
| 1327 | -27 |
|
16
|
| 1328 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1329 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1330 | -16 |
|
16
|
| 1331 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1332 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1333 | -27 |
|
16
|
| 1334 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1335 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1336 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1337 | NR |
|
16
|
| 1338 | -16 |
|
16
|
| 1339 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1340 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1341 | -15 |
|
16
|
| 1342 | 55 |
|
16
|
| 1343 | -14 |
|
16
|
| 1344 | -14 |
|
16
|
| 1345 | -14 |
|
16
|
| 1346 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1347 | -13 |
|
16
|
| 1348 | -27 |
|
16
|
| 1349 | -38 |
|
16
|
| 1350 | -14 |
|
16
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice