Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1276 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1277 | -21 |
|
17
|
| 1278 | -19 |
|
17
|
| 1279 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1280 | -29 |
|
17
|
| 1281 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1282 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1283 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1284 | -577 |
|
17
|
| 1285 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1286 | -137 |
|
17
|
| 1287 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1288 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1289 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1290 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1291 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1292 | -28 |
|
17
|
| 1293 | -16 |
|
17
|
| 1294 | -19 |
|
17
|
| 1295 | -16 |
|
17
|
| 1296 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1297 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1298 | NR |
|
16
|
| 1299 | -19 |
|
16
|
| 1300 | -17 |
|
16
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice