Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1251 | -29 |
|
17
|
| 1252 | -20 |
|
17
|
| 1253 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1254 | -14 |
|
17
|
| 1255 | 5 |
|
17
|
| 1256 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1257 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1258 | -321 |
|
17
|
| 1259 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1260 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1261 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1262 | -15 |
|
17
|
| 1263 | NR |
|
17
|
| 1264 | -25 |
|
17
|
| 1265 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1266 | NR |
|
17
|
| 1267 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1268 | -18 |
|
17
|
| 1269 | -36 |
|
17
|
| 1270 | -32 |
|
17
|
| 1271 | -19 |
|
17
|
| 1272 | NR |
|
17
|
| 1273 | -19 |
|
17
|
| 1274 | -17 |
|
17
|
| 1275 | -17 |
|
17
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice