Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1451 | NR |
|
15
|
| 1452 | -8 |
|
15
|
| 1453 | -18 |
|
15
|
| 1454 | -17 |
|
15
|
| 1455 | -9 |
|
15
|
| 1456 | -91 |
|
15
|
| 1457 | -15 |
|
15
|
| 1458 | -19 |
|
15
|
| 1459 | NR |
|
15
|
| 1460 | -80 |
|
15
|
| 1461 | -29 |
|
15
|
| 1462 | -13 |
|
15
|
| 1463 | -78 |
|
15
|
| 1464 | -12 |
|
15
|
| 1465 | -1 |
|
15
|
| 1466 | -15 |
|
15
|
| 1467 | -12 |
|
15
|
| 1468 | -21 |
|
15
|
| 1469 | -10 |
|
15
|
| 1470 | -13 |
|
15
|
| 1471 | -10 |
|
15
|
| 1472 | -14 |
|
15
|
| 1473 | -13 |
|
15
|
| 1474 | -12 |
|
15
|
| 1475 | -12 |
|
15
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice