Published Ranking Snapshots
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>
| Rank | ↑ ↓ | Fighter | Points |
| 1351 | -10 |
|
16
|
| 1352 | -15 |
|
16
|
| 1353 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1354 | 60 |
|
16
|
| 1355 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1356 | -11 |
|
16
|
| 1357 | -246 |
|
16
|
| 1358 | -22 |
|
16
|
| 1359 | -4 |
|
16
|
| 1360 | 46 |
|
16
|
| 1361 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1362 | -12 |
|
16
|
| 1363 | -69 |
|
16
|
| 1364 | -7 |
|
16
|
| 1365 | -9 |
|
16
|
| 1366 | -7 |
|
16
|
| 1367 | -7 |
|
16
|
| 1368 | -6 |
|
16
|
| 1369 | -31 |
|
16
|
| 1370 | 50 |
|
16
|
| 1371 | NR |
|
16
|
| 1372 | NR |
|
16
|
| 1373 | -322 |
|
16
|
| 1374 | -5 |
|
16
|
| 1375 | -7 |
|
16
|
<< Previous Issue | Next Issue >>

There is a bug in Published historical rankings of August 2013 in the Featherweight division. Every fighter appears twice