Comments on: MMA Rankings http://www.fightmatrix.com Mixed Martial Arts Rankings Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:08:42 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Fightmatrix rankings expanded to Top 250 - Page 4 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-2/#comment-12693 Fightmatrix rankings expanded to Top 250 - Page 4 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:05:17 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-12693 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> By: oleg http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-2/#comment-12079 oleg Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:24:26 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-12079 Filho's last few fights were at LHW. Filho’s last few fights were at LHW.

]]> By: Christos http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-2/#comment-12072 Christos Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:13:51 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-12072 Paulo Filho is no.12 in the LHW rankings.. I dont know why he is not in the MW list.. Paulo Filho is no.12 in the LHW rankings.. I dont know why he is not in the MW list..

]]> By: George http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-11685 George Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:26:48 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-11685 I can't believe Paulo Filho is not in the top 50 let alone the top 150...you gotta be kidding me!..we're talking about a guy who had the #2 185lb spot for a long time...i understand the guy had some personal problems but COME ON!..he only lost once to a guy that he already beat..and has fought and won twice since July! I can’t believe Paulo Filho is not in the top 50 let alone the top 150…you gotta be kidding me!..we’re talking about a guy who had the #2 185lb spot for a long time…i understand the guy had some personal problems but COME ON!..he only lost once to a guy that he already beat..and has fought and won twice since July!

]]> By: oleg http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-10289 oleg Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:39:24 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-10289 Patience, you must have. Patience, you must have.

]]> By: George http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-10288 George Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:35:08 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-10288 i'm confused as to why Gerard Mousasi is ranked in the heavyweight division when he has fought in middleweight and most recently lightheavyweight...and William, i don't know where you got your information but Fedor has beaten the "Who's Who" of MMA and has not participated in "gimmick fights" i’m confused as to why Gerard Mousasi is ranked in the heavyweight division when he has fought in middleweight and most recently lightheavyweight…and William, i don’t know where you got your information but Fedor has beaten the “Who’s Who” of MMA and has not participated in “gimmick fights”

]]> By: william http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-10212 william Sun, 09 Aug 2009 01:30:10 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-10212 fedor gets a lot of credit. he has fought some good fighters, however those at the top of the ufc have fought much better fighters more consistently,fedor fights gimmick fights and nobodys and his ranking should reflect that fedor gets a lot of credit. he has fought some good fighters, however those at the top of the ufc have fought much better fighters more consistently,fedor fights gimmick fights and nobodys and his ranking should reflect that

]]> By: adam http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-10178 adam Wed, 05 Aug 2009 12:24:39 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-10178 the only issue i have is the position of jorge santiago, he shouldn't be top 5. I wouldn't put him top 10 the only issue i have is the position of jorge santiago, he shouldn’t be top 5. I wouldn’t put him top 10

]]> By: oleg http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-9299 oleg Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:21:59 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-9299 Ben, that is correct. If we were to publish historical rankings as of 12/23/2000 (the day after the first Fedor-TK fight), TK would be ranked ahead of Fedor. On the other hand, TK was most likely ranked ahead of Fedor even before their first fight, as Emelianenko was only 4-0 at that time. Ben, that is correct. If we were to publish historical rankings as of 12/23/2000 (the day after the first Fedor-TK fight), TK would be ranked ahead of Fedor.

On the other hand, TK was most likely ranked ahead of Fedor even before their first fight, as Emelianenko was only 4-0 at that time.

]]> By: Ben http://www.fightmatrix.com/mma-ranks/comment-page-1/#comment-9279 Ben Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:57:09 +0000 http://www.fightmatrix.com/?page_id=4#comment-9279 First of all I want to say that I think your rankings are the most accurate I've seen. All of your rules for ranking make sense to me except possibly the rule that "a winner is always placed above the loser". Does this mean that if Fighter A lost his most recent fight to Fighter B he is as a rule ranked below him in the charts? For example, if the rankings after Kohsaka's fight against Fedor Emelianenko were shown, Kohsaka would be ranked above Fedor despite the historical evidence that suggests this is inaccurate? First of all I want to say that I think your rankings are the most accurate I’ve seen. All of your rules for ranking make sense to me except possibly the rule that “a winner is always placed above the loser”. Does this mean that if Fighter A lost his most recent fight to Fighter B he is as a rule ranked below him in the charts? For example, if the rankings after Kohsaka’s fight against Fedor Emelianenko were shown, Kohsaka would be ranked above Fedor despite the historical evidence that suggests this is inaccurate?

]]>