Posted on August 15, 2010 by jcs
Posted in MMA Ranks | Comments (4)
Thought Pulver was 80-something FW, he only had 43 rating points, which barely qualifies for top 200 at LW. It’s a much deeper division.
http://www.fightmatrix.com/historical-rankings/?Issue=152&Division=6&Page=2
I would have expected him to be higher for beating jens, who was 80-something at fw before the loss.
Pulver’s most recent fight was at lightweight. He dropped out of the rankings with the loss, and his opponent did get credit for the win:
http://www.fightmatrix.com/fighter-search/?fName=garijo
Is there a bug? Jens Pulver is gone from the rankings, and his opponent didn’t get credit for the win.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
Please visit the Fightmatrix.com discussion forum and let us know what you think about our ranking system!
Support Fightmatrix.com and reach thousands of MMA fans by advertising with us! Click for more details.
Thought Pulver was 80-something FW, he only had 43 rating points, which barely qualifies for top 200 at LW. It’s a much deeper division.
http://www.fightmatrix.com/historical-rankings/?Issue=152&Division=6&Page=2
I would have expected him to be higher for beating jens, who was 80-something at fw before the loss.
Pulver’s most recent fight was at lightweight. He dropped out of the rankings with the loss, and his opponent did get credit for the win:
http://www.fightmatrix.com/fighter-search/?fName=garijo
Is there a bug? Jens Pulver is gone from the rankings, and his opponent didn’t get credit for the win.