<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFC 99: How they stack up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightmatrix.com/2009/06/10/ufc-99-how-they-stack-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2009/06/10/ufc-99-how-they-stack-up/</link>
	<description>Mixed Martial Arts Rankings, Records, and Statistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcs</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2009/06/10/ufc-99-how-they-stack-up/comment-page-1/#comment-9572</link>
		<dc:creator>jcs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmatrix.com/?p=1150#comment-9572</guid>
		<description>67% is the usual

Velasquez/Kongo is just an unproven, rising fighter beating a veteran.. Expected.

Same for Hathaway/Story

Silva/Franklin was nip-tuck and were closely ranked.  Toss up.

Uno/Fisher was a true upset.... Questionable decision though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>67% is the usual</p>
<p>Velasquez/Kongo is just an unproven, rising fighter beating a veteran.. Expected.</p>
<p>Same for Hathaway/Story</p>
<p>Silva/Franklin was nip-tuck and were closely ranked.  Toss up.</p>
<p>Uno/Fisher was a true upset&#8230;. Questionable decision though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2009/06/10/ufc-99-how-they-stack-up/comment-page-1/#comment-9569</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmatrix.com/?p=1150#comment-9569</guid>
		<description>Higher ranked fighters were 8-4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Higher ranked fighters were 8-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobMarche</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2009/06/10/ufc-99-how-they-stack-up/comment-page-1/#comment-9446</link>
		<dc:creator>BobMarche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmatrix.com/?p=1150#comment-9446</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the useful info. It&#039;s so interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the useful info. It&#8217;s so interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

