Posted on June 10, 2009 by jcs

Light Heavyweight (195lbs)
[#7] Wanderlei Silva vs. [#8] Rich Franklin

Heavyweight
[#10] Cheick Kongo vs. [#33] Cain Velasquez

Welterweight
[#8] Mike Swick vs. [#67] Ben Saunders

Welterweight
[#11] Dan Hardy vs. [#22] Marcus Davis

Lightweight
[#16] Caol Uno vs. [#28] Spencer Fisher

Heavyweight
[#14] Mirko Filipovic vs. [#92] Mostapha Al-Turk

Lightweight
[#34] Terry Etim vs. [#278] Justin Buchholz

Lightweight
[#175] Dennis Siver vs. [#280] Dale Hartt

Welterweight
[#90] Paul Taylor vs. [#500] Peter Sobotta

Lightweight
[#118 WW] Paul Kelly vs. [#233] Rolando Delgado

Heavyweight
[#51] Stefan Struve vs. [#153] Denis Stojnic

Welterweight
[#41] Ricky Story vs. [#129] John Hathaway

Ranking Notes: Dark green font represents an approximate ranking. An asterisk represents a fighter who is ranked, but too low for an approximation. These two scenarios will clear up slightly as we move forward. “NR” means the fighter is not ranked, due to inactivity, or due to a rating that is at or below the default starter rating.


contact advertise@fightmatrix.com for current rates

Posted in MMA Ranks | Comments (3)

3 Responses to “UFC 99: How they stack up”

  1. jcs Says:

    67% is the usual

    Velasquez/Kongo is just an unproven, rising fighter beating a veteran.. Expected.

    Same for Hathaway/Story

    Silva/Franklin was nip-tuck and were closely ranked. Toss up.

    Uno/Fisher was a true upset…. Questionable decision though.

  2. Richard Says:

    Higher ranked fighters were 8-4.

  3. BobMarche Says:

    Thanks for the useful info. It’s so interesting

Leave a Reply