<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MMA Fighters rematch a lot!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightmatrix.com/2008/12/25/mma-fighters-rematch-a-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2008/12/25/mma-fighters-rematch-a-lot/</link>
	<description>Mixed Martial Arts Rankings, Records, and Statistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:12:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltokuda</title>
		<link>http://www.fightmatrix.com/2008/12/25/mma-fighters-rematch-a-lot/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>ltokuda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightmatrix.com/2008/12/25/mma-fighters-rematch-a-lot/#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>JCS, these are great statistics.  I&#039;ve always thought that statistics like these could be the key to creating an alternate type of rating system.  This type of data describes, in statistical terms, what a &quot;decision win&quot; means and what a &quot;KO win&quot; means.

Its also interesting that the data so far is pretty consistant with probability theory.  For example, if fighter A loses to fighter B by KO in their first fight, then the data suggests that fighter A only has a 32.3% chance of winning the rematch.  If fighter A loses by KO to fighter B in their second fight, then probability theory would predict that fighter A has a 0.323 x 0.323 = .104 = 10.4% chance of winning the third fight.  In your data, you found that fighters who lost by KO in the first 2 fight won the third fight 11% of the time.  This is very close to the 10.4% that probability theory predicts.

If you plan to do further research into this, one suggestion I have would be to also look at stats involving 3 fighters.  If fighter A beats fighter B and fighter B beats fighter C, then what&#039;s the probability of fighter A beating fighter C.  These types of statistics might give further insight on how &quot;styles make fights&quot;.

Great research.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JCS, these are great statistics.  I&#8217;ve always thought that statistics like these could be the key to creating an alternate type of rating system.  This type of data describes, in statistical terms, what a &#8220;decision win&#8221; means and what a &#8220;KO win&#8221; means.</p>
<p>Its also interesting that the data so far is pretty consistant with probability theory.  For example, if fighter A loses to fighter B by KO in their first fight, then the data suggests that fighter A only has a 32.3% chance of winning the rematch.  If fighter A loses by KO to fighter B in their second fight, then probability theory would predict that fighter A has a 0.323 x 0.323 = .104 = 10.4% chance of winning the third fight.  In your data, you found that fighters who lost by KO in the first 2 fight won the third fight 11% of the time.  This is very close to the 10.4% that probability theory predicts.</p>
<p>If you plan to do further research into this, one suggestion I have would be to also look at stats involving 3 fighters.  If fighter A beats fighter B and fighter B beats fighter C, then what&#8217;s the probability of fighter A beating fighter C.  These types of statistics might give further insight on how &#8220;styles make fights&#8221;.</p>
<p>Great research.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

